“…And, finally, natural law uses an equalizing criterion but moves away from idealism because it does not suppose that positive law loses its legal status to the extent that the idea of justice is not realized or, at least, insofar as it is opposed to it. 61 Whatever the position, it is no less true that the question of knowledge of justice and its very consistency are conflicts that are far from having been resolved to the satisfaction of all. The law is fair because it contains justice while, for the same reasons, every law is unfair because it is always an iustum imperfectum, it is not only the discrepancy between the ideal and the realization that can create a reason for negative evaluation, but also, taking a step further, under the logical aspect of justice, latent injustice emerges.…”