New Frontiers in Open Innovation 2014
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199682461.003.0014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theories of the Firm and Open Innovation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
110
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
110
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In doing so, we draw on previous research on OI and AC, jointly examining two theoretical approaches which are complementary (Vanhaverbeke & Cloodt, 2014). Also, a notable contribution in this research is the distinction between potential and realized AC and the examination of how each of these dimensions interacts with OI breadth and depth search strategies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In doing so, we draw on previous research on OI and AC, jointly examining two theoretical approaches which are complementary (Vanhaverbeke & Cloodt, 2014). Also, a notable contribution in this research is the distinction between potential and realized AC and the examination of how each of these dimensions interacts with OI breadth and depth search strategies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…OI has been researched from a number of perspectives, although linkages to established theories and related phenomena are still emerging (Dahlander and Gann 2010;Vanhaverbeke and Cloodt 2014;West and Bogers 2014;Randhawa, Wilden, and Hohberger 2016). Extant research on OI predominantly addresses the firm (or business unit) as the unit of analysis, while there is a growing recognition that other units of analysis need to be considered as well in order to get a more detailed understanding of the antecedents, processes and outcomes of OI ).…”
Section: Researching Oi Across Levels Of Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firms can benefit in a variety of ways from opening up their boundaries: for example, they can exploit the complementary assets of their partners, maximise income by selling unused intellectual properties (IP), save on the time and costs for developing innovation, attract potential customers by involving them in the production process, and establish new technology standards by forming partnerships (Dahlander and Gann 2010;Vanhaverbeke and Cloodt 2014;. As OI stresses the flow of information through permeable boundaries, different capacities are required in OI's three process of knowledge flow: (1) in-bound process when knowledge flows into the firm from the outside, (2) out-bound process when internal knowledge flows outside or (3) coupled process when both in-and out-bound process occur at the same time (Gassmann and Enkel 2004;Enkel, Gassmann, and Chesbrough 2009).…”
Section: Open Innovation Process and Related Capacitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%