Originating in the 1950's Quaker Community (see Sawyer, 1956), the expression "speaking truth to power" illustrates a spirit of resistance to dominant power structures and the belief that persuasion, such as through social movements, will defeat injustice. Walters (2005) defines social movements as "voluntary associations of people and organisations within civil society that rise and fall in response to particular social, economic, ideological, and political changes and issues often driven by the state or the market" (p. 54). This concept was embodied in collective actions like the Anti-Apartheid Movement (AAM), Poland's Solidarity Movement, the Temperance Movement in the United States, and more recently through Black Lives Matter, the Arab Spring, the Umbrella Movement, the Women's March on Washington, and #MeToo. National and transnational social movements such as these, and smaller community-based social movements, demonstrate the power of organized or tactical collectives born out of unrest. Driven by both dissatisfaction with current conditions and the potential for a new system of living, the movements seek to establish a new order by changing thoughts, policy, ideology, and actions that seek to "speak truth to power" (Blumer, 1951; Heberle, 1951; McCarthy & Zald, 1977). Movements serve as a means for critiquing the legitimacy and function of institutions and ideologies and often provide a means for reform. Social movements have previously been categorized as either an old social movement (OSM) or a new social movement (NSM) (Dykstra & Law, 1994). OSMs traditionally focus on class struggles, specifically, the unfair distribution of resources and the movement's role in enacting change to cause equal distribution (Buechler, 1995). NSMs involve social