Theorising Inequalities in Health: The Place of Lay Knowledge

Abstract

This paper contributes to the development of theory and research on inequalities in health. Our central premise is that these are currently limited because they fail adequately to address the relationship between agency and structure, and that lay knowledge in the form of narrative has a significant contribution to make to this endeavour. The paper is divided into three sections. In the first section we briefly review the existing, largely quantitative research on inequalities in health. We then move on to consider some of the most significant critiques of this body of work highlighting three issues: the pursuit of overly simple unidimensional explanations within 'risk factor' epidemiology and the (probably inevitable) inability of this research tradition to encompass the full complexity of social processes; the failure to consider the social context of individual behaviour and, in particular, the possibility for, and determinants of, creative human agency; and, thirdly, the need for 'place' and 'time' (both historical and biographical) to be given greater theoretical prominence. In the final section of the paper the potential theoretical significance of 'place' and 'lay knowledge', and the relationship between these concepts, in inequalities research is explored. Here we suggest three developments as a necessary condition for a more adequate theoretical framework in this field. We consider first the need for the conceptualisation and measurement of 'place' within a historical context, as the location in which macro social structures impact on people's lives. Second, we argue for a re-conceptualisation of lay knowledge about everyday life in general and the nature and causes of health and illness in particular, as narratives which have embedded within them explanations for what people do and why -and which, in turn, shape social action. Finally, we suggest that this narrative knowledge is also the medium through which people locate themselves within the places they inhabit and determine how to act within and upon them. Lay knowledge therefore offers a vitally important but neglected perspective on the relationship between social context and the experience of health and illness at the individual and population level.

Resourcefulness, reciprocity and reflexivity: the three Rs of partnership in sport for public health research

“…There is an explicitly identified partnership role for communities and individuals in promoting and achieving health improvements through sport and physical activity thus shifting power and decision-making to local community contexts as a way to create a more democratic, equitable model of health provision. Involving communities and the people for whom health services are designed may have some potential for improving delivery and service evaluation by genuinely listening to and working with stakeholders (Popay et al 1998, Barber et al 2011). Yet, through both intended and unintended consequences, community collaborations can serve to protect the status quo and limit the role of diverse community-based leadership (Chavis 2001, Smith et al 2008.…”

A qualitative study of influences on older women’s practitioner choices for back pain care

“…Qualitative examinations of subjective and individual experiences have complemented and balanced more population-based analyses of decision making and health utilisation [51-53]. This has involved exploring the subjective and community-based influences on provider choices as well as the role of lay knowledge and networks [54-56] on healthcare experiences and utilisation of practitioners across biomedicine, allied health and CAM. Yet such analyses have not been extended to women’s experiences of chronic pain and their negotiation of biomedical, allied health and CAM treatment options.…”

From causes to solutions - insights from lay knowledge about health inequalities

“…Research has highlighted important questions about areas and places as social spaces within which people live and interact with each other and with their environment [4,5]. The demand for an understanding of how people's identities, attitudes, behaviours and relationships are shaped by, and in turn shape, the places in which they live, intersects with the literature concerned with the contribution of lay knowledge in public health [6]. …”

“…Nevertheless, there is a small but significant body of work asking direct questions about how people make sense of the patterns of social inequalities that have been linked to health outcomes [4,6,16,20-22,19]. In this work researchers have a special interest in whether people accept social/structural explanations for inequalities and whether certain groups of people, in particular those with personal experience of disadvantage, are more or less likely to do so.…”