2006
DOI: 10.5040/9781838710392
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theorising National Cinema

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this regard, we agree with the definition of «national cinema» given by Vitali and Willemen (2006), who describe it as an industry and as a set of cultural strategies that do not exclude the recognition of national cultures as plural, heterogeneous and diverse. This view is shared by Hjort and Petrie (2007) in relation to the cinematography produced by small nations -of which Denmark, Wales and Scotland, in Europe, and Taiwan and Hong Kong, in Asia, constitute paradigmatic examples-, which consider the overseas promotion of their film productions as a cultural priority.…”
Section: Introduction and State Of The Art Reviewmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…In this regard, we agree with the definition of «national cinema» given by Vitali and Willemen (2006), who describe it as an industry and as a set of cultural strategies that do not exclude the recognition of national cultures as plural, heterogeneous and diverse. This view is shared by Hjort and Petrie (2007) in relation to the cinematography produced by small nations -of which Denmark, Wales and Scotland, in Europe, and Taiwan and Hong Kong, in Asia, constitute paradigmatic examples-, which consider the overseas promotion of their film productions as a cultural priority.…”
Section: Introduction and State Of The Art Reviewmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…The national persists in the transnational and the global. The revival of an interest in national cinema studies is testified by the publication of works such as the anthology Theorising National Cinema (Vitali and Willemen, 2006). However, it is no longer possible to return to some pristine, innocent notion of the nation-state and its cinema.…”
Section: National Cinemamentioning
confidence: 95%
“…133 Such a construction of the national stands in opposition to "nationalist cinema" characterized by Willemen as "complicit with nationalism's homogenizing project. " 134 The Egyptian cinema industry of the 1930s-a diverse mix of Egyptians, mutamassirun, and foreigners-saw itself contributing to a national project. It should come as no surprise that the Egypt reflected in these films mirrored this flexible, inclusive notion of national belonging.…”
Section: To Go Mizr Ahi: a Case Study Of Nationalmentioning
confidence: 99%