Up to the early 1990s, the African communication sphere was regularly placed at the bottom of any international evaluation-too little, too urban and too authority-oriented. But then the situation changed. New political winds found their expression in the Windhoek Declaration (1991). Independent media voices emerged. A little later, a surge of information and communication technologies swept over the continent, turning the ambitions towards digital forms of communication. The phenomenon has been called the 'smartphone revolution'. Africans have been ensured access to the Internet, and they have entered the modern world. But is the revolution really a revolution? Problems and contradictions in the mediascape are still prevalent, and a Habermasian public sphere is hardly available for anyone other than the urban middle and upper classes. Chantal Mouffe (2005) differentiates 'the political' and 'politics', which stands for institutional control and order, while 'the political' means individual's ability to antagonism. Is there space for the political in Africa? Arjun Appadurai (1996) has talked about imagination turning into social practice in global cultural processes. A prerequisite for such a development are social practices designed according to the needs of the society in question. However, as indicated in several studies (Berger, 2007; Rioba, 2009), changes in communication policies tend to be risky in Africa.