2017
DOI: 10.1002/ajcp.12118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theorizing Critical Placemaking as a Tool for Reclaiming Public Space

Abstract: As economic inequality and segregation continue to grow in the U.S., psychology has an important role to play in exploring and promoting processes that can disrupt social injustice. This paper identifies the privatization of public space as a social problem that contributes to the entrenchment of social, economic, and racial inequality, and advances "critical placemaking" as a tool for reclaiming public space for public use. Drawing from key concepts in environmental psychology, narrative psychology, and commu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
57
0
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 116 publications
(133 reference statements)
0
57
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings may have important policy implications as many cities are passing laws restricting daily acts of living in public spaces for homeless individuals as a way to reduce the visibility of homelessness in their communities (Clifford & Piston, ; Harris, ; Robinson, ). Some researchers have expressed concern that these laws will criminalize homelessness (Robinson, ), and others have argued for recreating public spaces as a tool for empowerment, inclusivity, and civic engagement (Toolis, ). To the extent that homeless people are considered part of the communities they inhabit, other residents may advocate for their unrestricted use of public spaces as participating members of their communities and our findings suggest laws restricting use of public spaces may not be supported by the general public.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings may have important policy implications as many cities are passing laws restricting daily acts of living in public spaces for homeless individuals as a way to reduce the visibility of homelessness in their communities (Clifford & Piston, ; Harris, ; Robinson, ). Some researchers have expressed concern that these laws will criminalize homelessness (Robinson, ), and others have argued for recreating public spaces as a tool for empowerment, inclusivity, and civic engagement (Toolis, ). To the extent that homeless people are considered part of the communities they inhabit, other residents may advocate for their unrestricted use of public spaces as participating members of their communities and our findings suggest laws restricting use of public spaces may not be supported by the general public.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oleh karenanya elemen fisik kota yang ikonik dan menarik secara visual dapat mengangkat citra kota. (Kjartansdóttir, 2014;Toolis, 2017).…”
Section: Peran Arsitektur Ikonikunclassified
“…Place attachment is also applied to immigration issues (Ng 1998, Hernández, Carmen Hidalgo et al 2007, Lewicka 2008, Dahl and Sorenson 2010 (Altman and Low 1992, Toolis 2017.…”
Section: Place Attachment and Sense Of Belongingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Toolis (2017) argues, the implications and problems associated with privatization of public spaces influences the everyday life of urban dwellers in three ways: by constraining access and participation; by constraining and confining the variety of voices; and by constraining possible interactions within a place. Toolis (2017) argues that these limitations result in exclusive, segregated, monologic, depoliticized, commodified, and passive urban spaces in which minorities like migrants, low-income people, and women are excluded and displaced.…”
Section: Immigration and Production Of Urban Spacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation