With the U.S. and many other developed economies running chronic deficits and the opposite occurring in Asia and emerging economies, global current account imbalances have become a new normal, the significance of which is further amplified, particularly in the escalating Sino-US trade disputes. As academics endeavor to understand the unquenchable trade disputes, one unignorable point is the long-standing issue of the current account deficit faced by the United States (Kumhof et al., 2012;Sheng, 2016). In a review of previous literature, savings below real investment in global producible capital have been argued by scholars as answers to this hot-button issue (Obstfeld & Rogoff, 2001). Obstfeld and Rogoff (2005) also developed a simple stylized model to calibrate exchange rate changes in response to various scenarios under which the U.S. current account deficit might be reduced from its unprecedented current level. Unfortunately, however, none of these explanations provide convincing theoretical analysis from a structural perspective, especially since the deficit problem is in fact not unique to the United States but is more of a common affliction of English-speaking developed economies (Bernanke, 2005). As the culprit of the global financial crisis in 2007-09, the global imbalance in the current globalized economy has more pernicious effects than its literal meaning. Borio and Disyatat (2010) also re-assessed the role of international finance in global imbalances and the financial crisis,