1985
DOI: 10.1109/joe.1985.1145116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theory and application of calibration techniques for an NDBC directional wave measurements buoy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Gaps in buoy records from nonoperation (e.g., Figures c and S2–S4), not uncommon during other years not examined here, obscure efforts to establish reliable long‐term trends from buoy records. Furthermore, gaining an understanding of Pacific wave variations, particularly their trends, from buoy estimates is challenged in several ways: (1) the much shorter buoy record (generally beginning in the early 1980s) compared to WW3 model Hs (beginning 1948), (2) large interannual fluctuations, such as the heightened wave activity during strong ENSO episodes [ Bromirski et al ., ] may significantly influence trends, especially if records are short, (3) the sparse buoy spatial coverage that inhibits reliable regional determinations, (4) the problems associated with multiple buoy platforms at the same location [ Gemmrich et al ., ], (5) buoy transfer function calibration issues [ Steele et al ., ], and (6) several decade time series and complete spatial coverage are particularly important to investigate fluctuations and changes in the presence of significant interdecadal storminess variability [ Bromirski et al ., ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gaps in buoy records from nonoperation (e.g., Figures c and S2–S4), not uncommon during other years not examined here, obscure efforts to establish reliable long‐term trends from buoy records. Furthermore, gaining an understanding of Pacific wave variations, particularly their trends, from buoy estimates is challenged in several ways: (1) the much shorter buoy record (generally beginning in the early 1980s) compared to WW3 model Hs (beginning 1948), (2) large interannual fluctuations, such as the heightened wave activity during strong ENSO episodes [ Bromirski et al ., ] may significantly influence trends, especially if records are short, (3) the sparse buoy spatial coverage that inhibits reliable regional determinations, (4) the problems associated with multiple buoy platforms at the same location [ Gemmrich et al ., ], (5) buoy transfer function calibration issues [ Steele et al ., ], and (6) several decade time series and complete spatial coverage are particularly important to investigate fluctuations and changes in the presence of significant interdecadal storminess variability [ Bromirski et al ., ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Continuous hourly nondirectional wave measurements [ Steele et al , 1985] along the Pacific coast of North America were initiated by NOAA during the early 1980s. Ten NOAA buoys at distributed locations in the northeast (NE) Pacific (Figure 1) were selected for comparison of wave climate parameters covering the 1981–2003 period.…”
Section: Ne Pacific Buoy Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the data analysed and presented in this paper comes from the Discus-N buoy. Detailed information pertaining to directionalwave measurements with NDBC Discus Buoys, data acquiring, processing and transmitting can be found in Steele, Lau and Hsu (1985) and Steele et al (1990 Figure 1. Geographic location of the SWADE experiment and location of various buoys (Weller et al, 1991).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%