2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-1186-0_37
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theory and computation towards coherent reflection imaging of tilted objects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These features do not appear for general formula (11). The dimensionless parameter responsible for transition from (11) to (13) is Φ = 2λ cos θ a sin 2 θ (a is the object feature size), introduced earlier in [11]. So for Φ 1, that means normally illuminated object, θ ≈ π/2, and wavelength λ = 2π/k small as compared to the feature size a, we arrive from general wave optics expression (11) to formula (13) representing the wave field which is characteristic for paraxial geometrical optics.…”
Section: The Image Field Distributionmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…These features do not appear for general formula (11). The dimensionless parameter responsible for transition from (11) to (13) is Φ = 2λ cos θ a sin 2 θ (a is the object feature size), introduced earlier in [11]. So for Φ 1, that means normally illuminated object, θ ≈ π/2, and wavelength λ = 2π/k small as compared to the feature size a, we arrive from general wave optics expression (11) to formula (13) representing the wave field which is characteristic for paraxial geometrical optics.…”
Section: The Image Field Distributionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…However the similarity between an object and image does not necessarily occur. Even in the ideal case their field distributions are related by the general transform (11), which provides reproduction of the object only for Φ 1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations