The Bloembergen, Purcell, and Pound (BPP) theory of nuclear
magnetic
resonance (NMR) relaxation in fluids dating back to 1948 continues
to be the linchpin in interpreting NMR relaxation data in applications
ranging from characterizing fluids in porous media to medical imaging
(MRI). The BPP theory is founded on assuming molecules are hard spheres
with 1H–1H dipole pairs reorienting randomly;
assumptions that are severe in light of modern understanding of liquids.
Nevertheless, it is intriguing to this day that the BPP theory was
consistent with the original experimental data for glycerol, a hydrogen-bonding
molecular fluid for which the hard-sphere-rigid-dipole assumption
is inapplicable. To better understand this incongruity, atomistic
molecular simulations are used to compute 1H NMR T
1 relaxation dispersion (i.e., frequency dependence)
in two contrasting cases: glycerol, and a (non hydrogen-bonding) viscosity
standard. At high viscosities, simulations predict distinct functional
forms of T
1 for glycerol compared to the
viscosity standard, in agreement with modern measurements, yet both
in contrast to BPP theory. The cause of these departures from BPP
theory is elucidated, without assuming any relaxation models and without
any free parameters, by decomposing the simulated T
1 response into dynamic molecular modes for both intramolecular
and intermolecular interactions. The decomposition into dynamic molecular
modes provides an alternative framework to understand the physics
of NMR relaxation for viscous fluids.