Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2010 Conference 2010
DOI: 10.1145/1851182.1851210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theory and new primitives for safely connecting routing protocol instances

Abstract: Recent studies have shown that the current primitives for connecting multiple routing protocol instances (OSPF 1, OSPF 2, EIGRP 10, etc.) are pervasively deployed in enterprise networks and the Internet. Furthermore, these primitives are extremely vulnerable to routing anomalies (route oscillations, forwarding loops, etc.) and at the same time too rigid to support some of today's operational objectives. In this paper, we propose a new theory to reason about routing properties across multiple routing instances.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Multiple control planes. Several designs have been proposed for composing multiple control plane layers to improve network reliability [4,15,26,33,34,48,52]. For example, B4 [26] builds layered control architecture to run central TE on top of the baseline routing protocols, and FBOSS [4,15] agents run specific control planes (i.e., OpenR [6] and BGP) simultaneously to compose both protocols' features.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Multiple control planes. Several designs have been proposed for composing multiple control plane layers to improve network reliability [4,15,26,33,34,48,52]. For example, B4 [26] builds layered control architecture to run central TE on top of the baseline routing protocols, and FBOSS [4,15] agents run specific control planes (i.e., OpenR [6] and BGP) simultaneously to compose both protocols' features.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, the attempt of building a single, infallible control plane often results in overengineered, complex control plane. Third, existing work in multiple control plane composition supports only a limited number of properties (e.g., reachability, domain backup) and fail to provide generic routing correctness guarantees (e.g., waypoint routing, subnet isolation) [34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the operator must decide which routers to include in each routing instance, subject to additional requirements such as resiliency. Second, the operator must select a small number of routers as border routers and configure connecting primitives [16,19] to "glue" the different routing protocol instances together. (The next section has a detailed description of the tradeoffs involved in this step.)…”
Section: Policy Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IGP migrations could also be performed by using route redistribution. Although new primitives have been recently proposed [42], we believe that relying on a ships-in-the-night approach (when possible) makes the entire migration process easier and more manageable.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%