“…Ultrastructural studies con ducted later were not able to confirm Darl ing 's [1958] hypothesis, but suggested that structural configurations at the prismatic level represented major potential path ways for diffusion [Frank and Brendel, 1966;Johnson, 1967;Mortimer and Tran ter, 1971;Scott et al, 1974;Jongehloed et al, 1975a, b;Haikelel al., 1983;Theuns et al, 1982;Ingram and Fejerskov, 1984], Some workers using the transmission electron microscope also noted that carious destruction may not be as dependent on the structural detail of the tissue as previously believed [Johnson, 1967]; and that carious invasion is, in ad dition to larger pathways, able to follow narrow lanes, such as intercrystalline spaces [Frank and Brendel, 1966]. Ultrastructural studies aimed at the effect of acids on individual enamel crystals have focussed mainly on the role of disloca tions [Daculsi and Kerehel, 1977], with particular emphasis on the preferential central dissolution of individual crystals [Johnson, 1967;Simmelink et al, 1974;Jongehloed et al, 1975a, b;Arends and Jongehloed, 1977;Voegel and Frank, 1977]. The resolving power of our SEM equipment is close to the size of central hole diameters reported in the literature (5-10 nm [Arends, 1982]) which may ex plain why the phenomenon was never re cognized in the surface layer of lesions.…”