2007
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.76.014522
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theory of a two-dimensional superconductor with broken inversion symmetry

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

9
195
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 154 publications
(205 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
9
195
1
Order By: Relevance
“…2) Examples are the mixing of spin-singlet and triplet Cooper pairings, 3,4) magnetoelectric effect, [5][6][7][8] helical superconducting phase, 3,[9][10][11][12][13][14][15] and topological superconductivity. 16,17) These unconventional features result from an antisymmetric spinorbit coupling, which can be classified in various categories such as Rashba-type, Dresselhaus-type, and cubic-type.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2) Examples are the mixing of spin-singlet and triplet Cooper pairings, 3,4) magnetoelectric effect, [5][6][7][8] helical superconducting phase, 3,[9][10][11][12][13][14][15] and topological superconductivity. 16,17) These unconventional features result from an antisymmetric spinorbit coupling, which can be classified in various categories such as Rashba-type, Dresselhaus-type, and cubic-type.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Naively, the magnetism should destroy the superconductivity. However, the strong spin-orbit coupling of the interface electrons allows these two competing phenomena to coexist peacefully 23 (see also [10]). Spin-orbit coupling mixes s-wave and p-wave superconductivity, so that the swave superconductivity which is present in the droplets in STO can induce a mixture of s-wave and p-wave superconductivity at the interface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A basic question, then, is whether the same electrons are exhibiting both superconductivity and magnetism or if, instead, there is a precise sense in which there are two species of electrons -two different electronic bands, for instance -one of which is superconducting and the other of which is magnetic. In the former case, the superconductivity must be exotic, perhaps p-wave superconductivity or a Fulde-Ferrel-Larkin-Ovchinnikov (FFLO) state [8][9][10][11] . This would contradict the conventional wisdom that the interface electrons are simply exhibiting the superconductivity of doped SrTiO 3 , which is presumed to be a phononmediated s-wave superconductor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,7) This FuldeFerrell-Larkin-Ovchinnikov-like state is easily destroyed by disorder. 8,9) Instead, a different inhomogeneous superconducting state appears, which is called the long-wavelength helical state. 8,9) Here the Cooper pairs have a very small but nonzero momentum q and the order parameter varies as exp(iq · r).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,9) Instead, a different inhomogeneous superconducting state appears, which is called the long-wavelength helical state. 8,9) Here the Cooper pairs have a very small but nonzero momentum q and the order parameter varies as exp(iq · r). Very recently, the present authors studied the effect of a parallel magnetic field H on the superconductivity of monolayer Pb films on GaAs(110).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%