1975
DOI: 10.1152/jn.1975.38.2.356
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theory of current source-density analysis and determination of conductivity tensor for anuran cerebellum

Abstract: The theoretical basis of current source-density (CSD) analysis in the central nervous system is described. Equations relating CSD, the current flow vector, and the extracellular field potential are given. It is shown that the CSD provides superior resolution of neuronal events when compared to conventional field-potential analysis. Expressions for the CSD in rectangular Cartesian coordinates are derived, including the general case of anisotropic, inhomogeneous conductive tissue, and a coordinate system rotated… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
492
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 664 publications
(499 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
7
492
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such currents are measured experimentally by electrodes in the neural tissue and the corresponding potentials are the LFPs. Consequently LFPs reflect the dendritic currents or correspondingly the membrane potentials on the dendrites (Nicholson and Freeman 1975;Freeman 1992). Since the EEG represents the spatial average of the dendritic activity (Nunez 2000), we consider the effective membrane potential u(x,t) = u e (x,t) -u i (x,t) which is proportional to the dendritic currents, see e.g.…”
Section: The Resting Statementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such currents are measured experimentally by electrodes in the neural tissue and the corresponding potentials are the LFPs. Consequently LFPs reflect the dendritic currents or correspondingly the membrane potentials on the dendrites (Nicholson and Freeman 1975;Freeman 1992). Since the EEG represents the spatial average of the dendritic activity (Nunez 2000), we consider the effective membrane potential u(x,t) = u e (x,t) -u i (x,t) which is proportional to the dendritic currents, see e.g.…”
Section: The Resting Statementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Population trans-membrane current flows were estimated using CSD analysis (Nicholson and Freeman, 1975), calculated as the second spatial derivative of field potentials (0.5-30Hz) after applying a 5-point Hamming filter (Ulbert et al, 2001a). Although the transmembrane currents localized with CSD are generally interpreted as due to transynaptic currents (Mitzdorf, 1985), voltage-gated currents may also contribute (Murakami et al, 2002).…”
Section: Recordings and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When CSD current sinks are generated by excitatory post-synaptic currents (EPSCs), they generally are accompanied by passive return current sources (Nicholson and Freeman, 1975). Conversely, at the normal depolarized state of cortical neurons (Destexhe et al, 2003), inhibitory post-synaptic currents (IPSCs) could produce active current sources, and they would be accompanied by a passive current sink.…”
Section: Perirhinal Cortex (Pr)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CSD analysis provides an approximation of summed transmembrane currents in vertically arranged structures Nicholson and Freeman, 1975), including the hippocampus and neocortex. The general disadvantage of this approach compared to electrodes with a sharp tip is that the recording contacts are located on the shaft formed by the cut end of the wire electrodes.…”
Section: Laminar Recording Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%