1968
DOI: 10.1016/0021-8928(68)90034-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theory of elasticity for a semilinear material

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

1970
1970
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here we find that ν = 1 2 implies the kinematic constraint on the deformation that i 1 = λ 1 + λ 2 + λ 3 = 3. The latter is associated with the notion of incompressibility in linear elasticity in the form tr E = 0 and in the present context can be viewed as a "semilinear" feature, in keeping with the descriptor [23] for the strain energy function (19). The kinematic condition, Div x = 3 or equivalently…”
Section: The Limit Ofmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Here we find that ν = 1 2 implies the kinematic constraint on the deformation that i 1 = λ 1 + λ 2 + λ 3 = 3. The latter is associated with the notion of incompressibility in linear elasticity in the form tr E = 0 and in the present context can be viewed as a "semilinear" feature, in keeping with the descriptor [23] for the strain energy function (19). The kinematic condition, Div x = 3 or equivalently…”
Section: The Limit Ofmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…To avoid confusion in terminology, it should be pointed out that ten years later potential (2.46) was given a different name: a material with potential (2.46) was called a semilinear material in [43,44] (this term was somehow adopted in the Russian scientific literature). This situation was mentioned in the monographs [26,27,69].…”
Section: Determination Of Follower Loadmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We employ convected coordinates and a mixture of referential and present bases, revealing interesting relationships between components of various tensors. Our Biot-quadratic energy is surprisingly rare in the nonlinear elasticity literature, although its roots go back to early work by Lurie [22] and John [23]. Inspired by the works of Atluri and Murakawa [24], Wiśniewski [25], and Merlini [26], we propose a variational principle in terms of position, Biot strain, and rotation fields, and show that constitutive stress-strain relations and balance equations can be written in terms of positions and stretches alone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%