1996
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.53.6085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theory of light scattering by thin nematic liquid crystal films

Abstract: Light scattering by thin nematic liquid crystal films is considered. The confinement has two important consequences. First, fluctuations with wave vectors not equal to the difference between the wave vectors o f the scattered and the incident light ray can contribute to the scattering. The distribution o f fluctuation wave vectors relevant to the scattering is peaked around this difference and has a width inversely proportional to the film thickness. Second, only a discrete set of fluctuation wave vectors is a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of the small number of experiments done in this field, comparison with anchoring constants found in the literature is difficult. We can, however, qualitatively compare our results to the dynamical measurements done in pores by extrapolation to smaller dimensions [13]. For thicknesses of 60 and 17.5 nm, our extrapolated values are of the order of 60 and 15 ms, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 53%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Because of the small number of experiments done in this field, comparison with anchoring constants found in the literature is difficult. We can, however, qualitatively compare our results to the dynamical measurements done in pores by extrapolation to smaller dimensions [13]. For thicknesses of 60 and 17.5 nm, our extrapolated values are of the order of 60 and 15 ms, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Taking into account that the free surface aligns the molecules perpendicularly to the surface and has no in-plane anchoring, we can again apply Eq. (3) in this regime [13], but now in a simplified form with C 2 0. Figure 3 also shows the inverse relaxation time as a function of the inverse thickness for this case.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations