2000
DOI: 10.1054/mehy.1998.0821
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theory of malignant cell transformation by superoxide fate coupled with cytoskeletal electron-transport and electron-transfer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…* P , 0.05, treatment stimulation index (SI) versus unstimulated SI (unstimulated SI 5 1). cytoskeleton (30), and in the regulation of cell cycle progression (31). These processes are thought to be due to effects of ROS on cyclins, cyclin-dependent kinases, and downstream signals that up-regulate the expression of transcription factors including nuclear factor (NF)-kB and AP-1 family members (31,32).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…* P , 0.05, treatment stimulation index (SI) versus unstimulated SI (unstimulated SI 5 1). cytoskeleton (30), and in the regulation of cell cycle progression (31). These processes are thought to be due to effects of ROS on cyclins, cyclin-dependent kinases, and downstream signals that up-regulate the expression of transcription factors including nuclear factor (NF)-kB and AP-1 family members (31,32).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, ROS represent important signalling molecules, altering for instance DNA binding and transactivation properties of transcription factors [40], as well as actin cytoskeleton regulation and remodelling. Superoxide, for instance, could be transported through actin microfilaments from the plasma membrane, or from the mitochondria, towards the nucleus [41], specifically influencing the transport into the nucleus of transcription-related proteins [42]. It could be the case of the far upstream element binding protein 1 [43] that was significantly reduced in fibroblasts after serum withdrawal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ROS are potentially mutagenic and may be involved in activation of protooncogene and inactivation of tumor suppressor genes (1,2). Thus, ROS are suspected to represent important human carcinogens (3,4). Oxidative signals, either external or internal, are thought to be detected by sensor molecules and mediated by cellular signal transduction systems, which eventually results in cell cycle arrest, senescence, or apoptosis in normal diploid fibroblast cells.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%