Particle Physics in Laboratory, Space and Universe 2005
DOI: 10.1142/9789812702074_0005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theory of Neutrino Oscillations

Abstract: The standard theory of neutrino oscillations has been formulated in the middle 70's (see Ref. [1]) on the basis of some assumptions that we are going to review critically. The main assumptions are four:(A1) Neutrinos are ultrarelativistic particles.(A2) Neutrinos produced or detected in CC weak interaction processes are described by the flavor stateswhere U is the unitary mixing matrix, α = e, µ, τ , and |ν k is the state of a neutrino with mass m k .(A3) The propagation time T is equal to the source-detector … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…( 291). On the one hand, the coherent creation of neutrino flavor states is indeed guaranteed from the observations of neutrino oscillations, implying that intrinsic flavor violation effects should be small [48,63,129,130]. If mass-eigenstates were created and detected incoherently, flavor violating effects would be analogous to flavor changing processes for quarks, at tree level, without the explicit appearance of the ∆m 2 dependence.…”
Section: The Bridge To the Quantum Mixingmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…( 291). On the one hand, the coherent creation of neutrino flavor states is indeed guaranteed from the observations of neutrino oscillations, implying that intrinsic flavor violation effects should be small [48,63,129,130]. If mass-eigenstates were created and detected incoherently, flavor violating effects would be analogous to flavor changing processes for quarks, at tree level, without the explicit appearance of the ∆m 2 dependence.…”
Section: The Bridge To the Quantum Mixingmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Another aspect of assumption (2) is that the definition of the usual flavor states in Eq. ( 291) is only approximate [130] and it may depend on the details of the creation and detection. Usually, however, the error made is of the order of ∆m 2 /E 2 ν and it can be neglected [130].…”
Section: The Bridge To the Quantum Mixingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The standard theory of neutrino oscillations [26] is based on certain assumptions such as i) Neutrinos are relativistic particles ii) Neutrinos are produced or detected in charged current weak interaction processes iii) The propagation time t is equal to the source-detector distance L and iv) The massive neutrino states have the same momentum. Now suppose a | ν α > flavor neutrino beam is generated at the source at space-time point (0,0) and is directed along X-axis to a detector at some distance L from the generation point, then the probability for finding a different flavor state | ν β > at some space-time point (x,t) in the beam at the detector will be given by square of the amplitude term |< ν β (x, t) | ν α (0, 0) >| Hence the oscillation probability is…”
Section: Gaussian Distribution and Mean Square Fluctuations Of Neutrinosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A well collimated and within ∆ | p | / p -or any similar definition of beam momentum spread -'monochromatic' beam is considered as a classical line, lets say along the positive z-axis, defining the mean direction from a definite production point ( x = 0 ) towards a detector, at distance d . But the associated operators for a single beam quantum (20) are subject to the uncertainty principle ( using units = 1 ) . The same is true for energy and time.…”
Section: Neutrino Oscillations -Historical Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%