1997
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.56.15242
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theory of potential modulation in lateral surface superlattices. II.  Piezoelectric effect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
54
0
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
54
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We find φ = +0.18, a value close to 1/4, the theoretical phase for pure electrostatic oscillations [18]. We therefore conclude that piezoelectric modulation dominates [15]. This is likely to have occurred from the prolonged exposure of dysprosium to air [19].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We find φ = +0.18, a value close to 1/4, the theoretical phase for pure electrostatic oscillations [18]. We therefore conclude that piezoelectric modulation dominates [15]. This is likely to have occurred from the prolonged exposure of dysprosium to air [19].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…This is the reason why the calculated curves show a maximum rather than a minimum at B = 0 in figure 4. A more accurate description of the experiment could be obtained by including in the model the real piezoelectric potential which is usually more complex than a sine function [15]. Secondly, a more accurate description of the anisotropy would require computing the effect of higher angular harmonics with two-fold symmetry, not just the a 2 and b 2 components.…”
Section: Theory and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The agreement between the experiment and the calculated effect of the deformation potential is an important result, since it is known that strong piezoelectric contributions are present in strained GaAs structures and can even become dominant over contributions of the deformation potential. 13 We cannot completely rule out that in the present structure both contributions coincidentally have a similar shape and are therefore not distinguishable. Evidence of other experiments 3 together with our present findings, however, indicate that the shape of the effective potential follows that of the deformation potential rather than that of the piezoelectric contribution.…”
Section: ͓S0003-6951͑98͒03034-4͔mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The piezoelectric and deformation potential energies were calculated assuming constant stress within the stressor [8]. This gives fundamental Fourier components of 1.0 and 0.1 meV, respectively, confirming that the deformation potential can be neglected.…”
Section: Theory and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%