1966
DOI: 10.21236/ad0634596
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theory of Spherical and Cylindrical Langmuir Probes in a Collisionless, Maxwellian Plasma at Rest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
362
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 351 publications
(373 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
11
362
0
Order By: Relevance
“…21, which included particle trapping, was different to the one found in Ref. 5, and they both correspond to the same parameter values.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…21, which included particle trapping, was different to the one found in Ref. 5, and they both correspond to the same parameter values.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The thick solid black lines correspond to numerical results of a stationary code (see for instance Ref. 5 or Ref. 22).…”
Section: Electron and Ion Densitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This means that the relative density fluctuations, n/n, can always be estimated from the relative variation in the probe current, I /I , assuming constant temperature. Using the numerical results of Laframboise (1966) as input to their calculations, Eriksson and Boström (1995) showed that I /I = n/n with a good accuracy, even for Debye lengths as small as the probe radius. In that situation, they found the relative error ( I /I − n/n)/( I /I ) to stay at a level of 0.1 or less for moderate fluctuation amplitudes.…”
Section: The Relative Density Variation N/nmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[16][17][18][19] The impact of relativistic effects using similar methods has been analyzed for a possible Jupiter mission with electrodynamic bare tethers. 20,21 The effects of emission were first investigated by Langmuir for a planar sheath problem, not fully self-consistent but a good approximation for strong double layers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%