2015
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.91.075302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theory of surface second-harmonic generation for semiconductors including effects of nonlocal operators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with the results reported in Ref. [20], where the exclusion of this term increases the intensity of the components of χ (−2ω; ω,ω) by approximately 15 to 20%. We also notice that the E 1 peak is larger than the E 2 peak, contrasting with the experiment, where the E 1 peak is smaller than E 2 .…”
Section: B Calculated R Ps Compared To Experimentssupporting
confidence: 82%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This is consistent with the results reported in Ref. [20], where the exclusion of this term increases the intensity of the components of χ (−2ω; ω,ω) by approximately 15 to 20%. We also notice that the E 1 peak is larger than the E 2 peak, contrasting with the experiment, where the E 1 peak is smaller than E 2 .…”
Section: B Calculated R Ps Compared To Experimentssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The matrix elements of r nm (k) are identical using either the local-density approximation (LDA) or scissored Hamiltonian [20], thus negating the need to label them. Of course, it is more convenient to calculate them through v LDA nm (k), which includes only the contribution of v nl nm (k).…”
Section: Nonlinear Susceptibility Tensormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations