1990
DOI: 10.1142/9789814503273_0007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theory of the Anomalous Magnetic Moment of the Electron – Numerical Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A simple check of this procedure, which is successful, is to insert the one-loop QED vacuum polarization [6], analytically continued to Euclidean space, into Eq. 4 and compare the result to the known value of the O(α 2 ) QED contribution to a µ [7]. Finally, we note that the kernel f (K 2 ) diverges as K 2 → 0, so the integral in Eq.…”
mentioning
confidence: 64%
“…A simple check of this procedure, which is successful, is to insert the one-loop QED vacuum polarization [6], analytically continued to Euclidean space, into Eq. 4 and compare the result to the known value of the O(α 2 ) QED contribution to a µ [7]. Finally, we note that the kernel f (K 2 ) diverges as K 2 → 0, so the integral in Eq.…”
mentioning
confidence: 64%
“…The value quoted in [84] is A 3 = 1.195 (26), where the error comes from the numerical procedure. In comparison, let us quote the value [85,77] A 3 = 1.176 11 (42) obtained if only a subset of 21 three loop diagrams out of the original set of 72 is evaluated numerically, relying on the analytical results for the remaining 51 ones, and recall the value A 3 = 1.181 241 456... obtained from the full analytical evaluation. The error induced on a e due to the numerical uncertainty in the second, more accurate, value is still ∆(a e ) = 5.3 × 10 −12 , whereas the experimental error is only ∆(a e )| exp = 4.3 × 10 −12 .…”
Section: Higher Order Mass Independent Correctionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 518 diagrams of Group V, with no closed lepton loops, await completion of an independent verification. However, their renormalization terms are derived by systematic reduction of original integrands applying a simple power-counting rule [81], allowing extensive cross-checking among themselves and with exactly known diagrams of lower order [82]. Numerical integrations with VEGAS [83], on many supercomputers over more than 10 years [62,84], then yields A…”
Section: New Determination Of the Fine Structure Constantmentioning
confidence: 99%