2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2014.02.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theory of un-scaled flexibility identification from output-only data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most of the existing methods processing ambient vibration data can only output basic modal parameters. This is because that the FRF magnitudes cannot be exactly estimated from ambient test data owing to the unknown input forces . However, the FRF magnitudes are important to the calculation of the mass‐normalized scaling factor, which is a function of modal mass.…”
Section: Unscaled Flexibility Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Most of the existing methods processing ambient vibration data can only output basic modal parameters. This is because that the FRF magnitudes cannot be exactly estimated from ambient test data owing to the unknown input forces . However, the FRF magnitudes are important to the calculation of the mass‐normalized scaling factor, which is a function of modal mass.…”
Section: Unscaled Flexibility Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the input force is a Dirac delta function, the structural response is the IRF. The FRF of the structure is obtained by performing Fourier transform of its IRF Hoi()ω=r=1noir+italicexp()ξrωrtitalicjωtitalicsin()ωdrtitalicdt where oir=ϕorϕirtrue/Mrωdr, ω r is the r th modal frequency, ξ r is the r th modal damping ratio, ϕ or and ϕ ir are the r th mode shape at nodes o and i , respectively, M r is the r th modal mass, and ωdr=ωr1ξr2 is the r th damped natural frequency. In the impact test, FRF is estimated by using both the measured input forces and output responses.…”
Section: Unscaled Flexibility Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Impact testing is a significant technique for structural‐condition assessment in SHM and it contains capabilities for rapid assessment and reliable diagnosis of bridges. Both structural responses and impact forces can be measured by impact testing, from which the structural frequency response function (FRF), including its magnitudes and shapes, can be computed, whereas only shapes of FRF can be obtained from the ambient vibration test (Zhang et al., ). However, the magnitudes of FRF are extremely important for the identification of structural parameters such as scaling factors and flexibility matrix.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhang et al. () proved that the impact test method with collecting force data has the advantage of identifying the magnitudes of structural frequency response functions (FRFs), and which are necessary for structural flexibility identification. However, the limitation of the traditional impact test method lies in that it requires a large number of sensors deployed on the entire structure, which usually leads to expensive experimental costs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%