2012
DOI: 10.1177/0275074012451311
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Theory-Pluralism in Public Administration

Abstract: Neopragmatists in public administration (PA) consistently argue that neopragmatism upgrades regular pragmatism. This claim rests on the contention that pragmatism is host to epistemic foundationalism, which undercuts legitimacy in PA. This article provides a new refutation of the upgrade claim, dissolving the hard-link constructed between epistemology and legitimacy by articulating theory-pluralism in research methods. Haack's "Analytic Framework" is advanced as a useful conceptualization of epistemic debates … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A qualitative desk review approach has been adopted to contribute the debate and reach the objectives of the study. Regional economic development policy mainly has macro and micro research perspectives (Whetsell, 2013). The macro-regional economic development policy is formulated by the central government and is formulated for the "problem space" or specific projects in the national socio-economic development, and its results and objectives may have cross-regional or overall impact (Spicer, 2005).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A qualitative desk review approach has been adopted to contribute the debate and reach the objectives of the study. Regional economic development policy mainly has macro and micro research perspectives (Whetsell, 2013). The macro-regional economic development policy is formulated by the central government and is formulated for the "problem space" or specific projects in the national socio-economic development, and its results and objectives may have cross-regional or overall impact (Spicer, 2005).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other articles relevant to the debate includeShields 2004Shields , 2005Webb, 2004;Snider, 2005Snider, , 2011Miller, 2005;Hildebrand, 2005Hildebrand, , 2008Whetsell and Shields 2011;Whetsell 2013; Kasdan 2015. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%