2008
DOI: 10.1353/cli.0.0034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

"Theory Uncompromised by Practicality": Hybridity in Jeffrey Eugenides' Middlesex

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Debora Shostak (2008) applies the foundations of Butler's (1988;2009) arguments on gender performativity to Middlesex (Eugenides, 2013) within the context of this heteronormative social panopticon in Theory Uncompromised by Practicality: Hybridity in Jeffrey Eugenides' "Middlesex". In this article, Shostak (2008, p. 383) first looks at Eugenides' address of the intersex narrative as a means to bring the conversation of gender performance narratives of intersex individuals to the mainstream public eye.…”
Section: Critique Of Calliope's Gender Identity Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Debora Shostak (2008) applies the foundations of Butler's (1988;2009) arguments on gender performativity to Middlesex (Eugenides, 2013) within the context of this heteronormative social panopticon in Theory Uncompromised by Practicality: Hybridity in Jeffrey Eugenides' "Middlesex". In this article, Shostak (2008, p. 383) first looks at Eugenides' address of the intersex narrative as a means to bring the conversation of gender performance narratives of intersex individuals to the mainstream public eye.…”
Section: Critique Of Calliope's Gender Identity Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…399-400). Through Shostak's (2008) qualitative examination and textual analysis of Calliope's gender identity performances in the Middlesex (Eugenides, 2013), she makes the final argument that despite Calliope's struggle to find a stable gender identity and his/her eventual attempt to become a masculine male in gender, all he/she would need to do is "act like a boy" to find a stable gender identity as a "stealth man" earlier and to avoid abjection (Shostak, 2008, p.p. 404-405).…”
Section: Critique Of Calliope's Gender Identity Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Comedy, as Henderson states, is used “as a way to get at the darker aspects of life without being so unrelenting that ‘you don't want to read it’” (Henderson ). Some critics attacked the novel for its failure to find the “middle,” to bridge theory and practice (Shostak , 385–386); for its “inadequate” and “false closure” (Cohen , 371, 387); or because of the protagonist's failure “to assimilate and pass as male” and whose “‘monster feeling’ […] reasserts throughout his adult life” (Graham , 12, 14). However, they sidestepped an in‐depth analysis of its comic dimension.…”
Section: Narrating Trauma: Tragicomedy In Middlesexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bhabha claims that Hybridity does not mean staying in the middle between the two original things and not to be combinatory and not means to eliminate the differences, but to maintain their own feature and to be something else. Shostak also says "no matter how generous and optimistic Eugenides' novel is, it demonstrates the virtual impossibility of such a third space except as a utopian fantasy" [4]. In Middlesex, the protagonist chose to live as a man, which just like Francisco Collado-Roriguez claims that "inally demands the opening of a borderland or third space where mixed races and intersex identities can coexist ", in the process requiring as well "a new type of ethical responsibility, one that openly advocates for a hybrid space of tolerance for individuals and communities" [5].…”
Section: Culture Transcendence Of Diasporic Immigrantmentioning
confidence: 99%