Theory vs Practice: Should Primary Care Practice Take on Social Determinants of Health Now? No.

Abstract

102R ecently, the recognition that medical care may contribute less to overall health than other aspects of people's lives do has led policy makers, academics, and even some physicians to argue that clinicians should make screening and action on the social determinants of health their responsibility. Although such an expectation is understandable, the additional requirements (that will fall largely on primary care) are likely to have serious unintended consequences and be unlikely to produce the hopedfor benefits.First, anyone proposing any new responsibilities for primary care clinicians must be unaware of the degree to which most of them already feel overworked, stressed, and discouraged. There is little joy in Mudville. Shanafelt et al's national survey of 7,300 physicians in 2012 reported that 46% of them had at least 1 symptom of burnout, 38% screened positive for depression, and 37% felt that their work schedule didn't leave enough time for personal or family life.1 Those in family or general internal medicine were at the wrong end of each of these spectrums among all medical specialties. Our recent unpublished survey from the 2013 COMPASS project of 700 primary care physicians in 18 widely diverse medical groups in 8 states found 30% reported feeling burned out; 12 months later this number had risen to 37%. Will an additional large responsibility help this unsustainable situation?Much of this workload and stress comes from all of the expectations that have especially been added for primary care physicians since I began doing patient care 43 years ago. Over the years, society seems to have decided that diagnosing and treating the problems that patients brought to our door was not adequate. Clinicians and care systems must now also screen and act upon assorted preventive services, fully control chronic conditions (not just relieve symptoms), provide the mental health care that an insufficient number of mental health professionals cannot, help patients modify a wide range of health behaviors, coordinate with a variety of community agencies, provide much more complete documentation, complete a bewildering number of forms, and proactively reach out to all of the people who had ever been seen in the practice in order to practice population medicine. In order to facilitate these tasks, clinicians have also been required to use electronic medical records and lead multidisciplinary teams that, while offering some clear advantages, also take a great deal of time. Many clinicians feel these added responsibilities are inefficient and not why they went into medicine. Finally, many of those social determinants (broken and dysfunctional families, substance abuse, homelessness, etc) have become much more frequent and problematic, often requiring greater time and adding stress to providing even traditional medical services.Simultaneously, we are in the midst of a great national effort to transform primary care in order to achieve much-needed improvements in quality, costs, and patient experience. Making all the changes in...

Improving Social Needs Intervention Research: Key Questions for Advancing the Field

“…32 At the same time, requiring providers to screen and provide social needs referrals on a routine basis could also increase provider burnout by adding yet one more requirement to already full schedules. 33,34 The field would benefit from studies that investigate how social needs interventions impact provider and staff burnout and turnover.…”

Health Benefits and Cost-Effectiveness of Brief Clinician Tobacco Counseling for Youth and Adults

“…Tobacco counseling competes with treatment of acute symptoms, management of multiple chronic diseases, and other preventive services, as well as suggestions to integrate clinical practice with community health organizations and to coordinate with community health workers to address patients' social determinants of health. [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] Yarnall and colleagues estimated that a physician with a panel of 2,500 patients would need 7.4 hours per day to deliver evidence-based preventive services 21 and as many as 10.6 hours to provide disease management for chronic conditions. 22 Though Altschuler et al estimated that a physician could care for a panel of 2,000 patients with the maximum feasible delegation of preventive services and chronic disease care to other primary care team members, 23 that level of delegation may be a long time coming.…”

The Monthly Cycle of Hypoglycemia

“…5–10 It remains particularly unclear whether such social determinants contribute to avoidable short-term healthcare costs, such that payers should expect to reduce short-term healthcare expenditures through such initiatives. 11 …”