1977
DOI: 10.1037/0022-006x.45.5.867
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Therapeugenic factors in psychotherapy: Effects of office decor and subject-therapist sex pairing on the perception of credibility.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

4
48
1

Year Published

1978
1978
1984
1984

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
4
48
1
Order By: Relevance
“…I t was hypothesized that previous results (Bloom et al, 1977;Merluzzi et al, 1The authors wish to thank Mark G. Sbarra for his valuable assistance in the collection and…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…I t was hypothesized that previous results (Bloom et al, 1977;Merluzzi et al, 1The authors wish to thank Mark G. Sbarra for his valuable assistance in the collection and…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A characteristic that has an impact on clients' perceptions is therapist gender. For example, Bloom, Weigel and Trautt (1977) found that therapists' sex and office decor interacted such that a female therapist in a traditional-professional office was perceived as significantly more credible than one in an ofice of humanistic decor. However, a male therapist in a humanistic office was viewed as more credible than one in a traditional-professional office.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These factors, e.g., client's faith in therapist, therapist's credibility and conveyed competence, ofice arrangement, therapistclient attitude similarity, etc., are distinguished from placebo factors in that there is no reason to assume a priori that they are theoretically inert or incidental to 'The present treatment, particularly given the nature of psychopathology and psychotherapeutic treatment (Bloom et al, 1977). The focus on therapeugenic factors in psychotherapy and the manipulation of these factors to effect outcomes is part of a relatively recent attempt to view the therapy process as a technique of social influence designed to affect client's attitudes and behaviors in a therapeutic fashion (Gillis, 1974).…”
Section: Colorado Stale Universitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-specific treatment factors are those factors, independent of specific therapeutic techniques, that potentiate therapeutic effects. Bloom, Weigel, and Trautt [36] , and Coe [23] propose four categories: 1) factors in the client (e.g., expectancy of success, faith in the healer, experience with healers, suggestibility, belief in treatment, anticipation of relief, age, intelligence, etc. ), 2) factors in the therapist (e.g., confidence in the therapist's own abilities and treatment, attitudes toward the client, persuasiveness), 3) the client-therapist relationship (e.g., client-therapist similarity, client's first experience of having someone who listens and "understands"), and 4) situational-procedural variables (e.g., demand characteristics such as the physical environment, rational credibility, suggestibility-enhancing aspects of the situation or procedure, popularity of the treatment).…”
Section: Enhancing Client Expectations About Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%