2015
DOI: 10.1038/mp.2015.80
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Therapeutic antidepressant potential of a conjugated siRNA silencing the serotonin transporter after intranasal administration

Abstract: Major depression brings about a heavy socio-economic burden worldwide due to its high prevalence and the low efficacy of antidepressant drugs, mostly inhibiting the serotonin transporter (SERT). As a result, ~80% of patients show recurrent or chronic depression, resulting in a poor quality of life and increased suicide risk. RNA interference (RNAi) strategies have been preliminarily used to evoke antidepressant-like responses in experimental animals. However, the main limitation for the medical use of RNAi is … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
89
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(60 reference statements)
3
89
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests that HMGB1 is not required for hippocampal cytokine and chemokine increases induced by a single stress, which increased more rapidly, but HMGB1 may contribute to the priming effects of stress-pretreatment, leading to the accelerated rate of induction of most hippocampal cytokines and chemokines after two stresses. Since previously intranasal administration has been shown to allow modification of hippocampal functions and intranasal or intracerebroventricular administration of a variety of siRNA constructs have been shown to knockdown levels of proteins in the hippocampus (Bortolozzi et al, 2012; Kim et al, 2012; Ferres-Coy et al, 2013; Kanazawa et al, 2014; Ferres-Coy et al, 2015; Mohanty et al, 2015), we tested the effects of knocking down HMGB1 by intranasal siRNA administration, followed by measurements of hippocampal cytokines and chemokines that were increased at 3 hr after two stresses. Intranasal administration of HMGB1 siRNA eliminated the stress-induced increase in the hippocampal HMGB1 level at 3 hr after two stresses (one-way ANOVA; F (2, 12) = 9.957, p < 0.05: Figure 5B).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that HMGB1 is not required for hippocampal cytokine and chemokine increases induced by a single stress, which increased more rapidly, but HMGB1 may contribute to the priming effects of stress-pretreatment, leading to the accelerated rate of induction of most hippocampal cytokines and chemokines after two stresses. Since previously intranasal administration has been shown to allow modification of hippocampal functions and intranasal or intracerebroventricular administration of a variety of siRNA constructs have been shown to knockdown levels of proteins in the hippocampus (Bortolozzi et al, 2012; Kim et al, 2012; Ferres-Coy et al, 2013; Kanazawa et al, 2014; Ferres-Coy et al, 2015; Mohanty et al, 2015), we tested the effects of knocking down HMGB1 by intranasal siRNA administration, followed by measurements of hippocampal cytokines and chemokines that were increased at 3 hr after two stresses. Intranasal administration of HMGB1 siRNA eliminated the stress-induced increase in the hippocampal HMGB1 level at 3 hr after two stresses (one-way ANOVA; F (2, 12) = 9.957, p < 0.05: Figure 5B).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All behavioral assessments were performed between 9:00 and 15:00 hr, 24 hr after the local microinfusion of aCSF or siRNA targeting GLAST or GLT‐1. Mice were evaluated in different behavioral paradigms: (a) open field test (OFT), (b) tail suspension test (TST), (c) forced swim test (FST) and, (d sucrose preference test (SPT) as previously reported (Bortolozzi et al, ; Ferrés‐Coy et al, ). On test day, animals were moved to a dimly illuminated room and were left undisturbed for at least 1 hr before testing.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Along these lines, in future experiments, it is important to determine when during the lifespan Mirta22 normalization is most effective at reversing behavioral and neurophysiological phenotypes and whether Mirta22 levels could be normalized by approaches as readily translatable into medical therapies as possible. These approaches include, for example, the application of siRNAs or shRNAs (73,74) or the use of antisense oligonucleotides to inhibit excessive Mirta22 gene expression based on their efficacy in preclinical models (75,76) and clinical studies (77,78) of neurodevelopmental or neurodegenerative disorders. Alternatively, use of genome editing via CRISPR could be another highly promising approach for modulating Mirta22 function (79,80).…”
Section: ;Mirta22mentioning
confidence: 99%