2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.01.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in De Novo Kidney Transplant Receiving the Modified-Release Once-Daily Tacrolimus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the finding that once-daily tacrolimus provided more stable drug blood concentrations than twice-daily tacrolimus,13 it was found to be necessary to use higher doses of once-daily tacrolimus to reach targeted trough levels after conversion from twice-daily tacrolimus, which concurs with previous reports 14,15,16,17. As shown in the results, administered doses of once-daily tacrolimus were higher than those of twice-daily tacrolimus after conversion, and the mean blood trough levels of once-daily tacrolimus were lower than those of twice-daily tacrolimus, especially at post-transplant 4 and 6 months.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Despite the finding that once-daily tacrolimus provided more stable drug blood concentrations than twice-daily tacrolimus,13 it was found to be necessary to use higher doses of once-daily tacrolimus to reach targeted trough levels after conversion from twice-daily tacrolimus, which concurs with previous reports 14,15,16,17. As shown in the results, administered doses of once-daily tacrolimus were higher than those of twice-daily tacrolimus after conversion, and the mean blood trough levels of once-daily tacrolimus were lower than those of twice-daily tacrolimus, especially at post-transplant 4 and 6 months.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Recently, the necessity of using higher doses of Tac QD to achieve a therapeutic level compared with the Tac BID dose in a kidney transplant has been reported [7][8][9][10], despite initial reports showing the bioequivalence of Tac QD with Tac BID. These reports suggest that lower Tac exposure is observed after conversion from Tac BID to Tac QD because of decreased bioavailability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Randomized phase III studies have reported that Tac QD was well tolerated with similar efficacy and safety profiles to Tac BID in kidney and liver transplantation [5,6]. However, several investigators have recently reported a sustained decrease in Tac exposure after conversion from Tac BID to Tac QD, and it is necessary to use a higher dose of Tac QD than Tac BID to achieve similar trough levels [7][8][9][10]. Therefore, the switch from Tac BID to Tac QD should be performed under close medical supervision.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 One study found that, for patients taking relatively high doses of tacrolimus, the AUC was in a therapeutic range despite subtherapeutic trough levels, indicating that occasional AUC assessment may be useful in routine clinical practice with TAC QD. 20 Older patients (.60 years old) have been found to require lower doses of TAC QD than younger patients to achieve therapeutic trough levels. 21 The efficacy and safety data from 14 additional observational studies are consistent with the randomized controlled trial data (Table 1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 The efficacy and safety data from 14 additional observational studies are consistent with the randomized controlled trial data (Table 1). [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] Although the effect of TAC QD versus TAC BID on adherence in de novo transplantation has not been systematically tested, an industry-sponsored modeling analysis that extrapolated the effect on adherence, as well as outcomes from a literature review of other studies of twiceversus once-daily medication, suggested that, after 5 years, graft survival would be 6.1% higher in the TAC QD group, which would result in a cost saving of US $9,411 per patient over the 5 years. 33 TAC QD is a useful treatment option that may reduce pill burden in patients adapting to life after transplantation, but an advantage in terms of efficacy or safety has not been demonstrated.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%