2016
DOI: 10.5588/ijtld.15.0792
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Therapeutic drug monitoring of isoniazid and rifampicin during anti-tuberculosis treatment in Auckland, New Zealand

Abstract: There were no clinically useful characteristics to guide use of TDM. Many patients had concentrations below international therapeutic intervals, but were successfully treated.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Barriers to TDM implementation are highlighted in a recent meta-analysis that aimed to summarize the evidence for the use of TDM but found generally low-quality observational studies from a few specialized centers [ 27 ]. Still other individual studies from well-resourced settings which have concluded that TDM did not affect outcome have examined its use only after patients have manifested slow response to therapy where equivalence in outcome could instead be interpreted as an actual benefit conferred by TDM in preventing the more rare events of relapse or acquired drug resistance [ 28 ]. In contrast in Virginia, recommendations were made to use TDM systematically early in the treatment course prior to the development of slow response for a distinct subpopulation at higher risk of poor treatment outcome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Barriers to TDM implementation are highlighted in a recent meta-analysis that aimed to summarize the evidence for the use of TDM but found generally low-quality observational studies from a few specialized centers [ 27 ]. Still other individual studies from well-resourced settings which have concluded that TDM did not affect outcome have examined its use only after patients have manifested slow response to therapy where equivalence in outcome could instead be interpreted as an actual benefit conferred by TDM in preventing the more rare events of relapse or acquired drug resistance [ 28 ]. In contrast in Virginia, recommendations were made to use TDM systematically early in the treatment course prior to the development of slow response for a distinct subpopulation at higher risk of poor treatment outcome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent report by Maze et al from New Zealand observed that even though patients had drug concentrations below the international therapeutic ranges, they were successfully treated (35). This raises a pertinent question: is there a need to define cutoff drug concentrations in various settings that would be a predictive marker of an unfavorable outcome?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the World Health Organization (WHO) has published guidelines for the treatment of TB with dose recommendations based on body weight, drug exposure may differ significantly in individuals due to pharmacokinetic (PK) variability 3–7 . Suboptimal drug exposure has been extensively reported to be associated with unfavourable outcomes such as delayed sputum conversion, treatment failure and even the development of drug resistance 8–10 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%