2013
DOI: 10.1111/j.1348-0421.12037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Therapeutic effect of peripheral administration of an anti-prion protein antibody on mice infected with prions

Abstract: It is generally thought that effective treatments for prion diseases need to inhibit prion propagation, protect neuronal tissues and promote functional recovery of degenerated nerve tissues. In addition, such treatments should be effective even when given after clinical onset of the disease and administered via a peripheral route. In this study, the effect of peripheral administration of an anti-PrP antibody on disease progression in prion-infected mice was examined. mAb 31C6 was administered via the tail vein… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, these studies suggest that anti-PrP antibodies have a relatively low acute neurotoxicity at likely therapeutic concentrations for prion infection (65)(66)(67).…”
Section: Prp-dependent Toxic Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Overall, these studies suggest that anti-PrP antibodies have a relatively low acute neurotoxicity at likely therapeutic concentrations for prion infection (65)(66)(67).…”
Section: Prp-dependent Toxic Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…In recent decades, the main strategy for developing drugs against prion diseases focused on reducing abnormal PrP accumulation using either small compounds, antibodies against PrP, or siRNA to stop PrP expression. These treatments showed certain effects on prion-inoculated mice [40][41][42]. These findings indicate that the conversion of PrP has an important role in the initial pathogenesis, and that anti-PrP compounds prolong the incubation time of the disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%