2018
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192243
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Therapeutic effects of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy on survival in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A meta-analysis

Abstract: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is a method widely used for patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS); nevertheless, its effect on survival remains unclear. The purpose of this meta-analysis study was to determine the effects of PEG on survival in ALS patients. Relevant studies were retrieved from PubMed, EmBase, and the Cochrane Library databases, from inception to June 2017. Studies comparing PEG with other procedures in ALS patients were included. Odds ratios (ORs) in a random-effects mode… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent European survey of 244 patients showed that EN support through a percutaneous gastrostomy was used in 6 % -23 % [66]. Even though there has been no RCT comparing EN to oral feeding in ALS patients in terms of survival, nutritional status, and QOL, two meta-analyses of 3 [67] and 10 cohort studies [68], respectively, showed a moderate survival advantage for patients with ALS on percutaneous gastrostomy EN support. The most recent analysis specifically showed a beneficial effect in 20-month survival rate (odds ratio [OR] 1.97, 95 %CI 1.21 -3.21; P = 0.007], but no significant effect on 30-day, 10month, and 30-month survival rates [68].…”
Section: Recommendationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent European survey of 244 patients showed that EN support through a percutaneous gastrostomy was used in 6 % -23 % [66]. Even though there has been no RCT comparing EN to oral feeding in ALS patients in terms of survival, nutritional status, and QOL, two meta-analyses of 3 [67] and 10 cohort studies [68], respectively, showed a moderate survival advantage for patients with ALS on percutaneous gastrostomy EN support. The most recent analysis specifically showed a beneficial effect in 20-month survival rate (odds ratio [OR] 1.97, 95 %CI 1.21 -3.21; P = 0.007], but no significant effect on 30-day, 10month, and 30-month survival rates [68].…”
Section: Recommendationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PEG typically delivers 30% of the patients’ daily caloric intake [6]. Prevention of rapid weight decline [7] and having a higher pre-morbid body mass index (BMI) [8,9] is thought to positively contribute to survival [10,11]. Naturally, a physician’s choice to prescribe PEG and a patient’s choice to accept it must take into account the heterogeneity of ALS, symptoms most troubling to each individual patient, the patient’s age of onset, and the patient’s personal preferences about surgery and supplementary nutrition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One study reported an even shorter survival time in the PEG group, but the control group consisted of individuals who declined the use of PEG as well as some who had no indication for parenteral feeding [28]. In a meta-analysis (n = 966) using an odds ratio (OD) as the survival rate, a higher mortality in patients without PEG compared to the PEG group was found only at the 20-month follow-up (OR = 1.97; 95% CI 1.21-3.21, p = 0.007); there was no significant difference in the 30-day or 30-month rates [61].…”
Section: Effect Of Peg On Weight and Survivalmentioning
confidence: 99%