2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucli.2011.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Therapeutic effects of peripheral magnetic stimulation on traumatic brachial plexopathy: Clinical and neurophysiological study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
38
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The reported beneficial effects of high‐induction electromagnetic field on acute and persistent pain prompted us to further explore whether LF‐EMF may be able to influence some of the known prototypical nociceptor‐specific ion channels. As an example, we have selected the transient receptor potential ankyrin subtype 1 (TRPA1) which is an excitatory ion channel expressed by nociceptive neurons of the dorsal root and trigeminal ganglia.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reported beneficial effects of high‐induction electromagnetic field on acute and persistent pain prompted us to further explore whether LF‐EMF may be able to influence some of the known prototypical nociceptor‐specific ion channels. As an example, we have selected the transient receptor potential ankyrin subtype 1 (TRPA1) which is an excitatory ion channel expressed by nociceptive neurons of the dorsal root and trigeminal ganglia.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High‐induction electromagnetic field applied peripherally over a muscle or spinal nerve roots is capable of improving sensorimotor impairments and reducing acute and persistent pain . Proprioceptive as well as superficial cutaneous and nociceptive afferents may be recruited in these processes, although the latter are generally thought to be less involved .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, no significant difference was found in VAS, which was measured to assess the degree of hip pain, between the two groups. Although a few studies reported that rPMS might reduce the musculoskeletal pain, such the effect occurred when rPMS was applied to the tender point or the proximal part of the nerve to the painful areas [ 22 30 ]. But the reason why there is no difference in our study could be because rPMS was applied not to the tender point but to the motor point.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Centrally, high frequency (>1Hz) transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) at the motor cortex or prefrontal cortices can produce analgesic benefits for various neuropathic pain conditions [Leung et al, ]. Peripherally, although dynamic magnetic flux use for pain relief is still limited, initial publications have suggested this technology can successfully be applied to treat pain of peripheral nerve origins as well [Smania et al, ; Weintraub and Cole, ; Khedr et al, ]. Aside from its non‐invasiveness, treatment involving dynamic magnetic flux requires no skin contact with potentially longer duration of relief, making it a perfect candidate for treating PTP‐NP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%