The effects of graded doses of ribavirin administered either by aerosol or intraperitoneally were compared in influenza virus-infected mice. The median effective dose values (based upon percent survival) were 3.3 and 15.8 mg/kg per day for the aerosol and intraperitoneal routes, respectively. Lung lesion scores and titer of virus were lower after aerosol than intraperitoneal therapy.Recently, ribavirin (1-3-D-ribofuranosyl-1,2,4-triazole-3-carboxamide) was found to be effective for the treatment of type A influenza virus infections in mice (1, 3-5). These experiments indicated that small-particle aerosols (mass median diameter, 1.4 gm) of ribavirin were more effective in reducing mortality, lesions in the lung, and virus concentrations in the lungs than approximately equivalent doses of drug given intraperitoneally (i.p.) (4). However, the data did not indicate how much better aerosol administration was than i.p. in terms of dosage required to achieve the same effect, i.e., how much ribavirin was required to achieve an effective dose that would allow >50% of the mice to survive (ED50). This information would be helpful when considering the possible administration of ribavirin by aerosol for the treatment of humans, especially if a significant therapeutic advantage was gained by using the aerosol route.The objective of this research was to determine the response of influenza virus-infected mice to selected doses of ribavirin given either by aerosol or i.p.The procedures employed for housing, infecting, and treating mice [Tac:(SW)fBR] have been described by Stephen et al. (4). Four selected doses of ribavirin were administered by each route. Doses ranged from 2.5 to 20 mg/kg per day by aerosol and from 5.0 to 40.0 mg/kg per day by the i.p. route. Treatment was initiated at 6 h after exposure to the virus and was repeated daily for a total of 5 days. i.p. injections were given once daily at the same time as the aerosols. A virus control group received no treatment. The degree of gross pathology in the lungs (lung lesion score) was evaluated in three mice on day 4 and in five mice on day 7 by 1 Present address: Plum Island Animal Disease Center, P.O. Box 848, Greenport, NY 11944. methods that have been described previously (4). The concentration of virus in the lungs was also determined on day 4 by previously described methods (5). Survival was recorded daily for 21 days in 25 mice that were randomly allocated for this purpose from each treatment group. Survival data from five replicate experiments were analyzed by probit analysis (2), and the dose of ribavirin yielding 50% survival (ED50) was calculated together with 95% confidence limits. Lung lesion scores and lung virus concentration data were evaluated by analysis of variance.The results are shown graphically in Fig. 1. The ED50 values after aerosol and i.p. administration of ribavirin were 3.3 mg/kg per day (95% confidence limits, 2.5 to 4.3) and 15.8 mg/ kg per day (95% confidence limits, 12.7 and 19.5), respectively. The slopes (data not shown) for the regre...