2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Therapeutic hypothermia after cardiac arrest: A retrospective comparison of surface and endovascular cooling techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
86
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
86
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a retrospective study by Merchant et al [71] of 32 patients in 3 large centers who underwent surface cooling using a mattress/blanket or ice bag, 63% of patients had temperature less than 32°C for more than 1 h. Temperature fluctuations also occurred throughout both the induction and ADH 0 xxxxx; IV 0 intravenous maintenance phases. This phenomenon has been consistently demonstrated in subsequent studies comparing different cooling methods [72][73][74]. Fans, washing the patient with alcohol baths, and ice immersions should not be used, as they are unpractical in the intensive care unit setting and ineffective for the maintenance and rewarming phases [3].…”
Section: Surface Coolingmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…In a retrospective study by Merchant et al [71] of 32 patients in 3 large centers who underwent surface cooling using a mattress/blanket or ice bag, 63% of patients had temperature less than 32°C for more than 1 h. Temperature fluctuations also occurred throughout both the induction and ADH 0 xxxxx; IV 0 intravenous maintenance phases. This phenomenon has been consistently demonstrated in subsequent studies comparing different cooling methods [72][73][74]. Fans, washing the patient with alcohol baths, and ice immersions should not be used, as they are unpractical in the intensive care unit setting and ineffective for the maintenance and rewarming phases [3].…”
Section: Surface Coolingmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…By means of heat exchange with blood catheters achieve hypothermia and maintain it precisely. In spite of these advantages, compared to surface cooling there is no significant difference in outcome [38].…”
Section: Surface Cooling Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Venoarterial systems support heart and lung, venovenous systems support lung during ECMO. ECCOR (venovenous, lower blood flow rates system with or without pump) supports only lung 41 [36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48] ECCOR is provided to remove CO 2 and, unlike ECMO, does not provide significant oxygenation. In contrast to ECMO, where the need for oxygenation requires high blood flow rates, ECCOR allows much lower blood flow rates (500-1000mL/min) and needs smaller access cannulas.…”
Section: Extra Corporeal Membrane Oxygenation (Ecmo) and Extra Corpormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[47] Recent studies have demonstrated that endovascular cooling is more accurate in keeping patients in the target temperature range than surface cooling with ice bags and cooling blankets. [79,80] Endovascular cooling also allows for concurrent use of surface warming to reduce shivering. However, endovascular cooling implies accessing the femoral vein to place the cooling catheter, increasing the risk of procedural complications and infection.…”
Section: Conclusion and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%