“…The decision to compare tacrolimus, available only as an ointment, against betamethasone valerate in a cream base was pragmatic based on clinical practice, where BMVc is preferred over the ointment base as an alternative to TACo (as reflected in the 2011 U.K. prescription analysis) . The difference in effect of BMVc and TACo on skin barrier function and integrity is unlikely to be a base effect for two reasons: firstly, examples of the damaging effects of prolonged TCS cream use have already been published compared with pimecrolimus cream; and secondly, the scale of the negative effects of BMVc is greater than the differences reported between ointment and cream bases . The effect of TACo here was similar to the effect of pimecrolimus cream reported in these examples.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…TCS represent a safe and effective treatment when used in short courses to treat flares of AD, and should be the first‐line therapy for AD . However, the prolonged use of moderate‐to‐superpotent TCS is associated with reduced epidermal thickness, abnormal keratinocyte differentiation and elevated TEWL . Transmission electron microscopy revealed marked changes in SC structure following TCS treatment, including irregular lipid bilayers and abnormal trafficking of lamellar bodies .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 Importantly here, prolonged TCS use has been shown to damage the structure and function of the skin barrier. 12,13 This mechanistic study therefore sought to investigate the effect of tacrolimus 0Á1% ointment (TACo) and betamethasone valerate 0Á1% cream (BMVc) in a head-to-head, within-volunteer, randomized comparison of the properties of the skin barrier in volunteers with a recent history of AD (or quiescent AD). Importantly, these volunteers exhibited clinically stable skin, were free of active signs of AD (clinical inflammation) and had not used anti-inflammatories for 6 months or more.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TCI are associated with burning/stinging on application . Importantly here, prolonged TCS use has been shown to damage the structure and function of the skin barrier . This mechanistic study therefore sought to investigate the effect of tacrolimus 0·1% ointment (TACo) and betamethasone valerate 0·1% cream (BMVc) in a head‐to‐head, within‐volunteer, randomized comparison of the properties of the skin barrier in volunteers with a recent history of AD (or quiescent AD).…”
In quiescent AD, 4 weeks of BMVc treatment adversely affected the biophysical properties of the skin and reduced the levels of natural moisturizing factor, whereas TACo improved the condition of the skin barrier.
“…The decision to compare tacrolimus, available only as an ointment, against betamethasone valerate in a cream base was pragmatic based on clinical practice, where BMVc is preferred over the ointment base as an alternative to TACo (as reflected in the 2011 U.K. prescription analysis) . The difference in effect of BMVc and TACo on skin barrier function and integrity is unlikely to be a base effect for two reasons: firstly, examples of the damaging effects of prolonged TCS cream use have already been published compared with pimecrolimus cream; and secondly, the scale of the negative effects of BMVc is greater than the differences reported between ointment and cream bases . The effect of TACo here was similar to the effect of pimecrolimus cream reported in these examples.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…TCS represent a safe and effective treatment when used in short courses to treat flares of AD, and should be the first‐line therapy for AD . However, the prolonged use of moderate‐to‐superpotent TCS is associated with reduced epidermal thickness, abnormal keratinocyte differentiation and elevated TEWL . Transmission electron microscopy revealed marked changes in SC structure following TCS treatment, including irregular lipid bilayers and abnormal trafficking of lamellar bodies .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 Importantly here, prolonged TCS use has been shown to damage the structure and function of the skin barrier. 12,13 This mechanistic study therefore sought to investigate the effect of tacrolimus 0Á1% ointment (TACo) and betamethasone valerate 0Á1% cream (BMVc) in a head-to-head, within-volunteer, randomized comparison of the properties of the skin barrier in volunteers with a recent history of AD (or quiescent AD). Importantly, these volunteers exhibited clinically stable skin, were free of active signs of AD (clinical inflammation) and had not used anti-inflammatories for 6 months or more.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TCI are associated with burning/stinging on application . Importantly here, prolonged TCS use has been shown to damage the structure and function of the skin barrier . This mechanistic study therefore sought to investigate the effect of tacrolimus 0·1% ointment (TACo) and betamethasone valerate 0·1% cream (BMVc) in a head‐to‐head, within‐volunteer, randomized comparison of the properties of the skin barrier in volunteers with a recent history of AD (or quiescent AD).…”
In quiescent AD, 4 weeks of BMVc treatment adversely affected the biophysical properties of the skin and reduced the levels of natural moisturizing factor, whereas TACo improved the condition of the skin barrier.
“…30 Recently, it has also been shown that treatment with moderately potent TCS for 4 weeks induced damaging effects on healthy stratum corneum, whereas, in the same experiment, no such effects were demonstrated for pimecrolimus cream 1%. 31 The benefit to patients with AD of these findings has still to be investigated in adequately powered, controlled clinical trials.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.