2018
DOI: 10.7812/tpp/18-046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Therapeutic Interferon Interchange in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis Lowers Health Care and Pharmacy Expenditures with Comparable Safety

Abstract: Health care expenditures decreased and adverse effects were limited among patients with MS who underwent an interchange from an IFN beta-1a to IFN beta-1b. These findings suggest that a therapeutic interchange between IFNs for patients with less-active MS disease is well tolerated. Further research is needed to determine the impact of such an interchange on disease progression.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This strategy had been successfully implemented in another Kaiser region. 11 Despite these agreed upon recommendations, use of the preferred interferon‐beta product remained low at 20.9% in 2010 and 20.1% in 2011 among all prescribed DMTs. For pwMS starting their first DMT, use of the preferred interferon‐beta product rose from 25% ( n = 68) in 2010 to 39% ( n = 103) in 2011.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This strategy had been successfully implemented in another Kaiser region. 11 Despite these agreed upon recommendations, use of the preferred interferon‐beta product remained low at 20.9% in 2010 and 20.1% in 2011 among all prescribed DMTs. For pwMS starting their first DMT, use of the preferred interferon‐beta product rose from 25% ( n = 68) in 2010 to 39% ( n = 103) in 2011.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was recommended that pwMS on higher priced interferon‐beta products be converted to the preferred interferon‐beta, with the exception of those who were previously unable to tolerate the preferred interferon‐beta. This strategy had been successfully implemented in another Kaiser region 11 . Despite these agreed upon recommendations, use of the preferred interferon‐beta product remained low at 20.9% in 2010 and 20.1% in 2011 among all prescribed DMTs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When KP had negotiated a 3 or more‐year contract with a significantly lower price on an interferon‐beta product, neurologists were encouraged to discuss switching to the lowest priced option with the patient with a low threshold for switching back should the patient be unable to tolerate the less expensive version. This strategy, when supported by pharmacists in KP Colorado, showed no evidence of return of disease activity, tolerability was generally high, with few pwMS switching back to the nonpreferred interferon‐beta, and the cost savings were significant 6 . As is standard practice in KP, patients on brand name glatiramer acetate were switched to generic when it became available unless their prescribing neurologist specifically requested a brand name.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This strategy, when supported by pharmacists in KP Colorado, showed no evidence of return of disease activity, tolerability was generally high, with few pwMS switching back to the nonpreferred interferon-beta, and the cost savings were significant. 6 As is standard practice in KP, patients on brand name glatiramer acetate were switched to generic when it became available unless their prescribing neurologist specifically requested a brand name.…”
Section: Interventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…В литературе встречаются сведения о клинических исследованиях, позволяющих сделать вывод о возможности замены препаратов рчИФН бета-1а на рчИФН бета-1b, однако такую воз-можность не следует рассматривать как полную взаимозаменяемость данных подтипов интерферонов. Выбор гликозилированной или негликозилированной формы в каждом конкретном случае зависит от множества факторов, в том числе от индивидуальных особенностей пациента [4][5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionunclassified