2009
DOI: 10.1177/1074840708330666
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Therapeutic Letters

Abstract: This article explores the impact of letter writing on therapeutic boundaries. Letters challenged and extended the spatial and temporal boundaries of the therapeutic relationship, and especially the boundary between the personal and the professional, resulting in greater relational connectedness and therapeutic intimacy between the author as therapist and his client participants. By crossing boundaries traditionally posited to keep clients safe, letter writing evoked a carefully considered use of boundary that,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Professional boundaries and power structures within mental health care are inherently connected, and when conceived as a means to maintain emotional distance, boundaries can be perceived to be actively opposed to mutuality (Harris, 2014). However, boundaries are best understood “like the skin of two hands joined, [to] mark both the places of separation and of meeting” (Rodgers, 2009, p. 51). As such, their negotiation is intrinsic to the process of mutuality rather than in opposition to it.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Professional boundaries and power structures within mental health care are inherently connected, and when conceived as a means to maintain emotional distance, boundaries can be perceived to be actively opposed to mutuality (Harris, 2014). However, boundaries are best understood “like the skin of two hands joined, [to] mark both the places of separation and of meeting” (Rodgers, 2009, p. 51). As such, their negotiation is intrinsic to the process of mutuality rather than in opposition to it.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, in the separate space of the workshop, mutuality is permitted by staff and residents meeting on the same ground of everyday personal experience. As well as the equalizing effect of writing on common themes of the everyday, the exchange of narratives between clinician and patient may play a crucial part in allowing participants to enter into a “collaborative, co-constructed relational endeavour in which each influences the other” (Rodgers, 2009, p. 59). Staff may have been perceived to invest in the patients’ personal and non-pathologized identity, creating resonance through being directed by the patient in inhabiting their narrative from the “inside”.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La conexión relacional (Rogers, 2009) se basa en la disponibilidad, la reciprocidad y la vulnerabilidad. Términos que favorecen el intercambio y sobre los que se cimenta el esperado feedback.…”
unclassified