2021
DOI: 10.3390/pediatric13040078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Therapeutic Options for Childhood Absence Epilepsy

Abstract: Childhood absence epilepsy (CAE) is a common pediatric generalized epileptic syndrome. Although it is traditionally considered as a benign self-limited condition, the apparent benign nature of this syndrome has been revaluated in recent years. This is mainly due to the increasing evidence that children with CAE can present invalidating neuropsychological comorbidities that will affect them up to adulthood. Moreover, a percentage of affected children can develop drug-resistant forms of CAE. The purpose of this … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, it was suggested that network changes might be syndrome-specific, and thus patterns of altered default mode network connectivity in genetic generalized epilepsy syndromes should differ from those in focal epilepsies [37,38]. Among the genetic generalized epilepsy syndromes, childhood absence epilepsy could occasionally become refractory [39,40] to standard treatments and might be related to a reduced functional connectivity between frontomesial regions and the anterior insula and/or frontal operculum [41]. At variance, another genetic generalized epilepsy syndrome, known as juvenile myoclonic epilepsy, could be associated with a reduced connectivity within the prefrontal cognitive networks that were supposed to be responsible of working memory difficulties during working memory tasks [42,43].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, it was suggested that network changes might be syndrome-specific, and thus patterns of altered default mode network connectivity in genetic generalized epilepsy syndromes should differ from those in focal epilepsies [37,38]. Among the genetic generalized epilepsy syndromes, childhood absence epilepsy could occasionally become refractory [39,40] to standard treatments and might be related to a reduced functional connectivity between frontomesial regions and the anterior insula and/or frontal operculum [41]. At variance, another genetic generalized epilepsy syndrome, known as juvenile myoclonic epilepsy, could be associated with a reduced connectivity within the prefrontal cognitive networks that were supposed to be responsible of working memory difficulties during working memory tasks [42,43].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LEV was designed to be used as monotherapy or as adjunctive therapy to treat various generalized epilepsies and also used to treat Therapy-Resistant CAE. LEV can not only affect the a-amino-3hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionic acid receptor channels, but also won't affect glutamate or GABA-mediated synaptic transmission and modulation of voltage-dependent sodium or T-type calcium currents by blinding to SV2A synaptic vesicle glycoprotein [33]. As for now, it has been shown that LEV has a great curative effect on those patients who suffer from the Therapy-Resistant CAE.…”
Section: Levetiracetam (Lev)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cross et al (2002) [35] tested the therapeutic utility of TPM in five children with TAs on 24-hour ambulatory EEG in an open-label, single-site pilot experiment. The youngsters had previously been untreated or had failed to respond to other ASMs [33]. After six weeks, ambulatory EEG monitoring was used to assess response.…”
Section: Topiramate (Tpm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Even though physicians are generally aware of the advantages of the new ASMs, some old ASMs are still recognized as efficacious. Among the old ASMs, valproic acid (VPA) is one of the representative mainstay ASMs in the real world [ 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 ]. However, considering the advantageous and disadvantageous characteristics of each ASM, since ideal ASMs should offer sufficient efficacy with minimal AEs, physicians naturally wonder whether they should continue to prescribe VPA or instead replace VPA with new ASMs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%