2021
DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s283204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Therapeutic Options in Unresectable Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review

Abstract: Purpose This review describes the current scientific evidence of therapeutic options in unresectable oral squamous cell carcinoma. Methods This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). We searched MEDLINE (Via PubMed) to identify studies assessing treatments for unresectable oral squamous cell carcinoma. The methodological quality assessment of the included studies was performed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JB… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The inclusion criteria derived from this framework were: (i) both prospective and retrospective studies investigating PD‐L1 expression in samples procured from primary and naive OSCC patients; and (ii) studies that reported survival indexes based on calculating multivariable hazard ratio (HR) and its 95% confidence interval (95% CI) for at least OS and/or DFS. Our meta‐analysis adhered to existing guidelines, including Meta‐analyses Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines (Stroup, 2000 ), Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA), and the Newcastle‐Ottawa Scale (NOS) statement (Liberati et al, 2009 ; Mattox et al, 2017 ). Studies not dealing with OSCC, not reporting PD‐L1 positive and negative expression, or not reporting survival data in an extractable manner were excluded, as were studies represented by abstracts only or other article types, such as letters, reviews, animal and cell culture studies, and case reports.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inclusion criteria derived from this framework were: (i) both prospective and retrospective studies investigating PD‐L1 expression in samples procured from primary and naive OSCC patients; and (ii) studies that reported survival indexes based on calculating multivariable hazard ratio (HR) and its 95% confidence interval (95% CI) for at least OS and/or DFS. Our meta‐analysis adhered to existing guidelines, including Meta‐analyses Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines (Stroup, 2000 ), Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA), and the Newcastle‐Ottawa Scale (NOS) statement (Liberati et al, 2009 ; Mattox et al, 2017 ). Studies not dealing with OSCC, not reporting PD‐L1 positive and negative expression, or not reporting survival data in an extractable manner were excluded, as were studies represented by abstracts only or other article types, such as letters, reviews, animal and cell culture studies, and case reports.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) refers to squamous cell carcinoma originating in the oral cavity, including the cheeks, lips, mouth floor, tongue, and palate. It is one of the common head and neck malignant tumors worldwide ( 1 , 2 ). There are almost 300,000 new cases of OSCC each year, and about 170,000 related deaths ( 3 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a predominant form of oral cancer, oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) not only affects the lips, tongue, gums, floor of the mouth, and hard and soft palates, but also metastasizes to other parts of the body if not treated in time 1 . The various and complex risk factors which influence OSCC include smoking habits, alcohol use, poor oral hygiene, exposure to human papillomavirus (HPV), or even disease histories such as head and neck cancer 2 . It is crucial to understand the molecular changes during the development and progression of OSCC to improve OSCC patients' survival rates and reduce recurrence 3 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%