2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00127-009-0163-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Therapeutic relationships: their specificity in predicting outcomes for people with psychosis using clinical and vocational services

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The HAS scores in this study correspond to a study of community patients [18] which recorded; feeling respected and regarded (66.2 sd 24.7), beliefs about receiving the right treatment (79.5 sd 22.9), and feeling understood by clinical staff (73.5 sd 27.4). Another assessment of users in community services [32] also noted higher HAS scores with the overall average HAS score ranging from 75.09 to 77.27 over a six month period. The indication is the recorded therapeutic relationship scores in this cohort were not as high as those noted by community mental health service users in previous studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The HAS scores in this study correspond to a study of community patients [18] which recorded; feeling respected and regarded (66.2 sd 24.7), beliefs about receiving the right treatment (79.5 sd 22.9), and feeling understood by clinical staff (73.5 sd 27.4). Another assessment of users in community services [32] also noted higher HAS scores with the overall average HAS score ranging from 75.09 to 77.27 over a six month period. The indication is the recorded therapeutic relationship scores in this cohort were not as high as those noted by community mental health service users in previous studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some tentative support for the concept of the therapeutic relationship in general mental health services being focused on a particular shared ‘task’ is provided by a recent study of vocational services for people with psychosis. This found that early therapeutic relationships between service users and their vocational workers were predictive of vocational outcomes (such as finding employment) but not of clinical and social functioning outcomes, while relationships with clinical keyworkers were not predictive of vocational outcomes but did predict improved quality of life (Catty et al , 2008, 2009). Evidence concerning any impact of psychiatric service users’ own attributes on alliance ratings has been limited, but greater psychopathology has been found to be associated with a poorer therapeutic relationship for both people with schizophrenia and those with alcohol addiction (McCabe & Priebe, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Engaging people with the most serious disorders in a trusting relationship (McCabe et al 2012;Dixon et al 2016) is essential. Coercion can undermine success: a perceived loss of autonomy may create a more negative dynamic between client and clinician (Theodoridou et al 2012), while a good relationship improves quality of life and functional outcomes (Catty et al 2010(Catty et al , 2011. In psychiatric rehabilitation, the working relationship often encompasses an entire team or several members of a team and the client's family or other social network members.…”
Section: Engagement and Relationshipmentioning
confidence: 99%