1997
DOI: 10.1093/jjco/27.4.251
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Therapeutic Results of Resection, Transcatheter Arterial Embolization and Percutaneous Transhepatic Ethanol Injection in 3225 Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective Multicenter Study

Abstract: The outcome in 3225 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was studied in groups with equivalent prognosis treated with resection, transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE), and percutaneous transhepatic ethanol injection (PEI). Significant factors for better clinical background included a tumor diameter of < or = 30 mm, tumor number < or = 3 and (clinical) Stage I. In patients with Stage I disease having tumors of < or = 30 mm and < or = 3 in number, survival afer resection and PEI did not differ, while… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
68
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
68
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Ryu et al, PEI was the choice of treatment for clinical stage II patients with tumors smaller than 3 cm. For clinical stage I patients with such small tumors, selective PEI or surgical resection should be considered [11] . In these cases, the outcomes of PEI and surgery were similar but better than TACE.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Ryu et al, PEI was the choice of treatment for clinical stage II patients with tumors smaller than 3 cm. For clinical stage I patients with such small tumors, selective PEI or surgical resection should be considered [11] . In these cases, the outcomes of PEI and surgery were similar but better than TACE.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For those with the same tumor characteristics and poorer hepatic functional reserve, PEI showed better outcome than surgery. 29 Meanwhile, a Japanese nationwide comparative study, which was based on the analysis of comparable patients treated by PEI (n ϭ 4,037) or surgery (n ϭ 8,010) at approximately 800 hospitals, indicated that surgery gave better overall survival than PEI for patients with solitary 2-5 cm tumors at any liver function status. For solitary Յ 2 cm tumors arising from the liver with poor functional reserve, PEI was almost as efficacious as surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No RCTs have demonstrated that surgical resection is superior to percutaneous ablation. In nonrandomized comparative studies, hepatectomy was better than percutaneous ablation in one study [213] whereas others reported no significant difference between the two therapies [310][311][312]. Thus, it is difficult to conclude that surgical resection is the treatment of choice for resectable HCC.…”
Section: Local Ablation Is a First-line Treatment Of Unresectable Smmentioning
confidence: 99%