2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2020.106167
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Therapeutic ultrasound experiments in vitro: Review of factors influencing outcomes and reproducibility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 136 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Inappropriate setups generate uncertainty in the exposure that for in vitro cell stimulation can exceed 700% . For example, a vast majority of systems currently used in this field exploit nontransparent materials ( e.g. , standard plastic Petri dishes) along the US beam path: they reflect part of the energy and may produce some hardly predictable effects, such as standing wave formation .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inappropriate setups generate uncertainty in the exposure that for in vitro cell stimulation can exceed 700% . For example, a vast majority of systems currently used in this field exploit nontransparent materials ( e.g. , standard plastic Petri dishes) along the US beam path: they reflect part of the energy and may produce some hardly predictable effects, such as standing wave formation .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To understand the physical phenomena, laboratory tests are performed on cells placed in Petri dishes and insonified by acoustic waves. Unfortunately, as mentioned in [13], several parameters are liable to compromise the monitoring of the acoustic dose delivered to the cells. Among them, the distance between the transducer and the Petri dish, the coupling medium (degassed water), and the formation of standing waves inside the culture medium.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The formation of standing waves inside the Petri dish of the in vitro LIUS device is a challenging problem that prevents accurate prediction of exposure conditions of the cells. This limitation of numerous in-vitro ultrasound stimulation protocols is often mentioned in the literature [11][12][13] and some technical solutions are proposed [14][15][16][17] but without examining their effectiveness, except a very recent paper [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although ultrasound stimulation was found to promote sEV yields of various cell types, the poor reproducibility of these research results hindered the practical application of ultrasound. It mainly resulted from the uncertainty in the multiple ultrasound field parameters experienced by sonicated donor cells [ 112 ]. Therefore, it is necessary to develop more stable and controllable equipment for ultrasound output.…”
Section: Current Strategies To Regulate the Production And Biological Function Of Sevsmentioning
confidence: 99%