2006
DOI: 10.1080/10503300500268540
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Therapist effects in the National Institute of Mental Health Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
78
1
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
5
78
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, this range is comparable with the existing literature, where some studies have reported TEs near zero (e.g. Ehlers et al, 2013;Elkin et al, 2006;Owen, Tao, & Rodolfa, 2010) while other studies have reported TEs of 10% or higher (e.g. Boswell, Castonguay, & Wassermann, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interestingly, this range is comparable with the existing literature, where some studies have reported TEs near zero (e.g. Ehlers et al, 2013;Elkin et al, 2006;Owen, Tao, & Rodolfa, 2010) while other studies have reported TEs of 10% or higher (e.g. Boswell, Castonguay, & Wassermann, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The sample contained 17 therapists who treated between 4-11 patients each. Using the same sample, Elkin, Falconnier, Martinovich and Mahoneya (2006) could not find variance associated with therapists, whereas Kim and colleagues (2006) identified a TE of approximately 8%. The small sample size, along with other issues, has been identified as a cause of these contrary results (CritsChristoph & Gallop, 2006;Elkin, Falconnier, & Martinovich, 2007;Lutz & Barkham, 2015;.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…However, the present study's findings are in contrast to Elkin et al (2006) who did not find significant therapist effects. In the present study, the results indicated that although therapist effects were statistically significant, they were not large enough to analyze using multilevel modeling.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…This evidence base has, however, been criticised for being founded on studies with typically small sample sizes (e.g., often around 20-120 patients with 5-20 therapists). Accordingly, studies utilizing large-scale routine practice data sets have been recommended (Elkin, Falconnier, Martinovich, & Mahoney, 2006). In contrast to traditional or high-intensity delivery models of therapies, considerably less attention has been paid to therapist effects with low-intensity interventions (e.g., Almlov, Carlbring, Kallqvist, Paxling, & Cuipers, 2011), despite increasing use of such interventions in clinical practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%