2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10591-015-9358-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Therapists’ Perspectives of the Cotherapy Experience in a Training Setting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The two therapists need to have made a common commitment, gone through struggles of power and control, integrated differences and developed a balanced role responsibility, and built closeness and trust (Brent & Marine, 1982;Dugo & Beck, 1997). Clark et al (2016) comprehensively reviewed and www.FamilyProcess.org 1916 / FAMILY PROCESS summarized the facilitating practices into five basics: (1) making a commitment to the relationship; (2) spending time discussing role division, expectations, and theoretical orientations, to know each other as people and as therapists; (3) communicating openly about and respecting differences (4) dealing with emerging countertransference issues with openness and honesty; and (5) seeking supervision from a third party. In contrast, processes such as competitiveness, over-dependence, envy and sexual attraction between cotherapists, triangulation of others, and ineffective communication can undermine the cotherapist team.…”
Section: Developing An Effective Cotherapist Teammentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The two therapists need to have made a common commitment, gone through struggles of power and control, integrated differences and developed a balanced role responsibility, and built closeness and trust (Brent & Marine, 1982;Dugo & Beck, 1997). Clark et al (2016) comprehensively reviewed and www.FamilyProcess.org 1916 / FAMILY PROCESS summarized the facilitating practices into five basics: (1) making a commitment to the relationship; (2) spending time discussing role division, expectations, and theoretical orientations, to know each other as people and as therapists; (3) communicating openly about and respecting differences (4) dealing with emerging countertransference issues with openness and honesty; and (5) seeking supervision from a third party. In contrast, processes such as competitiveness, over-dependence, envy and sexual attraction between cotherapists, triangulation of others, and ineffective communication can undermine the cotherapist team.…”
Section: Developing An Effective Cotherapist Teammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unanimously, studies indicate the importance of delineating the different types of cotherapist team combination (i.e., homogeneous/heterogeneous) before citing the specific advantages/challenges of each (Hendrix et al, 2001; Tanner et al, 2012). The cotherapist working relationship has been regarded as the key that affects therapists’ learning and satisfaction with the cotherapy experiences (Bernard, Drob, & Lifshutz, 1987; Clark, Hinton, & Grames, 2016) and the key that decides whether it adds value to service quality (Hendrix et al, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research also reveals that the kind of supervision support interns receive at this stage is vital as poor supervision may intensify their anxiety regarding their clinical abilities and lead to poor service outcomes (Clark et al 2016;Folkes-Skinner et al 2010;Furr and Carroll 2003). Over two decades ago, Bischoff (1997) commented on how interns reacted to different supervising approaches.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%