There Are Layers to Liars: A Systematic Literature Review of Online Dating Deception

Abstract

Studies have used different terms interchangeably to refer to a wide range of phenomena revolving around more-or-less severe forms of online dating deception. In this systematic literature review, we first examine what terms and definitions are commonly used to refer to online dating deception. Results demonstrate the use of heterogeneous terms and definitions. The terminology from the literature was structured within the Typological Model of Deception in Online Dating (TOMDOD), describing the characteristics of various layers of deception in online dating, ranging from impression management to catfishing. Our second goal was to provide a TCCM analysis (theories, contexts, characteristics, and methodology) of research into online dating deception. Findings showed little variation in research methods (i.e., surveys), the online dating phase under study (i.e., profile), and the operationalization (i.e., outcome variable), while theoretical frameworks and the nature of deception strongly varied. Theoretical and practical implications and future research avenues are discussed.

Can human intelligence safeguard against artificial intelligence? Exploring individual differences in the discernment of human from AI texts

“…Modern generative artificial intelligence (hereafter, gAI) models are aggressively blurring the lines between human and artificial intelligence capabilities. The widening use, and ongoing enhancement of gAI systems, most especially large language models (e.g., ChatGPT 1 , Gemini 2 ), has raised concerns about the potential for these tools to amplify cheating and deceitful self-presentation 3 – 7 replace the human workforce, 8 and propagate disinformation. 9 , 10 In the scientific arena, AI-generated science abstracts are difficult to spot, and fears are growing that even whole-cloth studies fabricated with gAI could evade detection by the peer-review process.…”