2013
DOI: 10.1119/1.4789885
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

There are no particles, there are only fields

Abstract: Quantum foundations are still unsettled, with mixed effects on science and society. By now it should be possible to obtain consensus on at least one issue: Are the fundamental constituents fields or particles? As this paper shows, experiment and theory imply unbounded fields, not bounded particles, are fundamental. This is especially clear for relativistic systems, implying it's also true of non-relativistic systems. Particles are epiphenomena arising from fields. Thus the Schroedinger field is a space-filling… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
72
0
10

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
1
72
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…While fields are an abstract entity known to challenge students thinking (Bradamante & Viennot, 2007), traditionally they have been introduced as mathematical constructs rather than as real physical entities (Swackhamer, 2005). The view that fields are "real" and not just a mathematical entity is wholly consistent with modern physics (Hecht, 2003;Hobson, 2013). Fields provide a "place" for energy when it is not manifested in objects (Quinn, 2014), something which has typically been a source of confusion for students (Lindsey, Heron, & Shaffer, 2012;Summers, 1983).…”
Section: Approaches To Teaching About Energymentioning
confidence: 89%
“…While fields are an abstract entity known to challenge students thinking (Bradamante & Viennot, 2007), traditionally they have been introduced as mathematical constructs rather than as real physical entities (Swackhamer, 2005). The view that fields are "real" and not just a mathematical entity is wholly consistent with modern physics (Hecht, 2003;Hobson, 2013). Fields provide a "place" for energy when it is not manifested in objects (Quinn, 2014), something which has typically been a source of confusion for students (Lindsey, Heron, & Shaffer, 2012;Summers, 1983).…”
Section: Approaches To Teaching About Energymentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The key point is that with use of relevant parameters, classical (Newtonian) physics applies equally across spatial and matter periodicities; furthermore, matter and spatial quanta 'react' alike, the major determinant being geometric in character, Obande (2017c). Nature makes no distinction between wave and particle in its primitive interactions, all is wave, Born (1935), Macken (2011), Hobson (2013, Obande (2013), Consiglio (2015Consiglio ( , 2016. The present (classical) approach points to existence of a spatial periodicity analogous to the chemical (matter) periodicityspace is defined with same quantum effects and chemical physics as matter complete with hierarchical quanta sizes that parallel atomic mass evolution.…”
Section: Mass-energy Equivalence: Astrophysical and Cosmological Implmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the eigenframe of C, tensor Q can be parametrized as [20] Q = q 0 (e 1 ⊗ e 1 − e 2 ⊗ e 2 ) + q m (e 1 ⊗ e 2 + e 2 ⊗ e 1 ) (11) where q 0 and q m are scalar order parameters and λ = q 2 0 + q 2 m , see Equation (5). For simulation purposes, we introduce scaled and dimensionless quantities.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of particular interest are topological defects (TDs), which, in isolation, are topologically protected and consequently they cannot be destroyed [4]. They might represent "fundamental particles" of the Standard model (which are from this perspective emergent) if relevant fields represent fundamental entities of nature [5] as first suggested by Skyrme already in 1962 [6]. Note that the first theory on coarsening dynamics of TDs was developed in cosmology in order to explain TDs in the Higgs field of the early universe [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%