Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
PurposeWhile research on privacy concerns is rich in understanding and depth, there is still not a clear understanding of why people express having privacy concerns, but do not behave consistently with their concern. We propose that this misalignment derives from a diverse set of privacy boundaries, depending on the user. This research builds on prior Communication Privacy Management Theory research to further define individual privacy boundaries. Beyond that, we evaluate the relationship between the privacy boundaries people set, and their ability to protect themselves.Design/methodology/approachA survey was conducted to assess how private individuals find twenty items. Along with measuring the sensitivity of information, we collected responses on the Online Privacy Information Literacy test to measure differences in sensitivity based on privacy knowledge. 285 participant’s responses were evaluated using exploratory factor analysis and K-means clustering.FindingsWe identify five different groups of privacy indicators. Our findings also suggest that users have limited understanding of how to keep data private, even if they have high privacy concerns.Originality/valueWe contribute to theory by offering guidance on how to better apply theoretical understanding, based on our results. More explicitly, we offer analysis that suggests boundary conditions might be absent from current theoretical understanding. Practically, we offer guidance for understanding privacy differences, which is important to understanding how to implement privacy protection laws.
PurposeWhile research on privacy concerns is rich in understanding and depth, there is still not a clear understanding of why people express having privacy concerns, but do not behave consistently with their concern. We propose that this misalignment derives from a diverse set of privacy boundaries, depending on the user. This research builds on prior Communication Privacy Management Theory research to further define individual privacy boundaries. Beyond that, we evaluate the relationship between the privacy boundaries people set, and their ability to protect themselves.Design/methodology/approachA survey was conducted to assess how private individuals find twenty items. Along with measuring the sensitivity of information, we collected responses on the Online Privacy Information Literacy test to measure differences in sensitivity based on privacy knowledge. 285 participant’s responses were evaluated using exploratory factor analysis and K-means clustering.FindingsWe identify five different groups of privacy indicators. Our findings also suggest that users have limited understanding of how to keep data private, even if they have high privacy concerns.Originality/valueWe contribute to theory by offering guidance on how to better apply theoretical understanding, based on our results. More explicitly, we offer analysis that suggests boundary conditions might be absent from current theoretical understanding. Practically, we offer guidance for understanding privacy differences, which is important to understanding how to implement privacy protection laws.
In diesem Artikel wird der Sprachassistent Alexa vor dem Hintergrund des Plattformökosystems Amazons untersucht. Hierzu werden Elemente der Plattform- und Infrastrukturtheorie verwendet, um die Rolle des Assistenten in Relation zu den anderen Plattformen der Firma zu konzeptualisieren. Diese Betrachtung ermöglicht es Alexa zum einen als Daten-, Entwicklungs- und Testinfrastruktur von Künstlicher Intelligenz für Amazon und zum anderen als Komfort-Infrastruktur für Nutzer:innen zu betrachten. Um das Wechselverhältnis dieser beiden Rollen nachzuvollziehen, wird ein iteratives Modell entwickelt, welches den Entwicklungsprozess von Alexa als Technologiekomplex nachvollzieht. Die Erkenntnisse, die in der Genese dieses Modells gewonnen werden können, eignen sich dazu den Sprachassistenten als Plattform und Infrastruktur im Plattformökosystem Amazons zu situieren und herauszuarbeiten, welchen Nutzen der Assistent für Amazon haben kann. Dieses letzte Argument trägt zur Weiterentwicklung des theoretischen Instrumentariums zur Betrachtung von Plattformen bei, als dass es diese als wandelbare relationale Infrastrukturen in einem Plattformökosystem begreift, deren Rollen sich im Laufe der kontinuierlichen Entwicklung verändert.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.