2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.aogh.2016.07.002
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

There’s No App for That: Assessing the Impact of mHealth on the Supervision, Motivation, Engagement, and Satisfaction of Community Health Workers in Sierra Leone

Abstract: Findings suggest that there are no systematic changes in perceived supervision, work engagement, job satisfaction, or motivation between CHWs who received a mobile phone set up on a closed user group with the MOTECH Suite application and those who either only received a phone with the closed user group or no phone at all. Therefore, the results of this study do not provide sufficient evidence to support the use of mobile technology or mHealth applications to strengthen these organizational factors within CHW p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In April 2018, we used the key term "work engagement" to conduct a separate search of the literature on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using UWES to measure overall work engagement. We found 19 RCTs conducted since 2012 (Hengel et al, 2012;Vuori et al, 2012;Strijk et al, 2013;Ângelo and Chambel, 2013;Coffeng et al, 2014;van Berkel et al, 2014;Imamura et al, 2015Imamura et al, , 2017Bernburg et al, 2016;Buijze et al, 2016;Ebert et al, 2016a,b;Heber et al, 2016;Vallières et al, 2016;van Dongen et al, 2016;Klatt et al, 2017;Michishita et al, 2017;Steinberg et al, 2017;Gollwitzer et al, 2018). However, only six studies showed a significant improvement in work engagement in the intervention group compared to the control group (Imamura et al, 2015(Imamura et al, , 2017Ebert et al, 2016a;Heber et al, 2016;Steinberg et al, 2017;Gollwitzer et al, 2018).…”
Section: The Intervention Studies To Improve Work Engagementmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In April 2018, we used the key term "work engagement" to conduct a separate search of the literature on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using UWES to measure overall work engagement. We found 19 RCTs conducted since 2012 (Hengel et al, 2012;Vuori et al, 2012;Strijk et al, 2013;Ângelo and Chambel, 2013;Coffeng et al, 2014;van Berkel et al, 2014;Imamura et al, 2015Imamura et al, , 2017Bernburg et al, 2016;Buijze et al, 2016;Ebert et al, 2016a,b;Heber et al, 2016;Vallières et al, 2016;van Dongen et al, 2016;Klatt et al, 2017;Michishita et al, 2017;Steinberg et al, 2017;Gollwitzer et al, 2018). However, only six studies showed a significant improvement in work engagement in the intervention group compared to the control group (Imamura et al, 2015(Imamura et al, , 2017Ebert et al, 2016a;Heber et al, 2016;Steinberg et al, 2017;Gollwitzer et al, 2018).…”
Section: The Intervention Studies To Improve Work Engagementmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A small number of studies used self-reported satisfaction, 64 motivation 58 or increased agency 57 as outcomes to measure the impact of ongoing training. These are what Kok et al 88 refer to as ‘software’ of a training programme and can affect motivation and performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Challenges with supervision have been observed in other large-scale CHW programs [14, 21, 22], but the literature also reaffirms that CHWs are most effective when supported by a skilled health worker [23]. Therefore, in cases where CHAs are not co-located with their supervisors, alternative models of supervision should be explored such as using mobile technology; fostering peer supervision, learning, and support; and establishing community monitoring and feedback mechanisms [24, 25]. Though context plays an important role in the choice of supervision models, the overarching theme is to have a supervision approach that focuses on supportive approaches, problem solving, community involvement, and quality assurance [24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%